The Daily A Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade in Alabama
May 17, 2019
Sabrina Tavernise, a National correspondent for The New York Times, and Eric Johnston, an Alabama lawyer instrumental in drafting a stringent abortion law, tackle the unfolding legal battle in Alabama. Johnston shares why he knowingly drafted an unconstitutional law, while Tavernise highlights its harsh penalties of up to 99 years in prison. They discuss the broader implications of such restrictive laws amidst a national resurgence of anti-abortion legislation and the mobilization of conservative voters. The personal and political ramifications of these changes are intensely explored.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Keiko's Story
- After the success of "Free Willy," fans discovered Keiko's poor living conditions.
- This led to public outrage and demands for his release, sparking a science experiment.
Roe v. Wade's Initial Impact
- Initially, Roe v. Wade wasn't a significant political issue, even for conservative lawyers like Johnston.
- The opposition grew slowly, driven by conservative thinkers who used abortion to mobilize evangelical voters.
Constitutional Deficiencies of Roe v. Wade
- Roe v. Wade rests on the constitutional right to privacy, which isn't explicitly stated.
- This ambiguity provided an opening for conservatives to challenge its legal validity.