Discover the historical debate on Vitalism, exploring the role of electricity in defining life. From Frankenstein's experiment to debates on vital auras in human embryology, witness the quest to unlock the secret of life itself. Delve into contrasting views of vitalism in 19th-century France and the ongoing debate with DNA discovery.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Vitalism saw life as possessing a unique vital principle distinct from chemistry, while materialism treated everything as machines.
Experiments with electricity, like Galvani's twitching frogs, challenged perceptions of life's vital force and its relation to physical principles.
Deep dives
Debate Between Vitalism and Materialism in the 17th and 18th Centuries
In the 17th and 18th centuries, a debate arose between vitalism and materialism in understanding life. Vitalism suggested that living creatures possess a unique vital principle, distinct from chemistry and physics, while materialism viewed everything, including humans, as machines. This debate was influenced by scientific discoveries related to electricity and the exploration of what differentiates the living from the dead.
Search for the Spark of Life Through Electricity
Experiments with electricity, exemplified by Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta in the late 18th century, aimed to uncover the vital force behind life. Galvani's work with frogs' legs and Volta's creation of an electric battery challenged perceptions of innate animal electricity and its relation to human-generated electricity. These experiments contributed to the debate on whether life was governed by organic organization or by physical principles like electricity.
Role of Biology in the Vitalism Debate
The emergence of modern biology, exemplified by figures like Claude Bernard, offered insights challenging pure materialism and vitalism. Claude Bernard's deterministic approach to studying living organisms highlighted the intersection of mechanistic and vitalistic perspectives in understanding life. The study of biology continued to evolve, drawing from both mechanistic and vitalistic viewpoints.
Continuation of the Vitalism Debate with Modern Science
Despite scientific advancements like the discovery of DNA in the 1950s, the debate on vitalism persists. Schoeninger's work in the post-World War II era and the subsequent development of molecular biology highlighted the complexity of understanding life. Intelligent design and philosophical reflections continue to draw upon vitalistic arguments, indicating that the debate between vitalism and materialism remains a nuanced and enduring discussion in modern science.
Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Vitalism, an 18th and 19th century quest for the spark of life. On a dreary night in November 1818, a young doctor called Frankenstein completed an experiment and described it in his diary: “I collected the instruments of life around me, that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing that lay at my feet…By the glimmer of the half-extinguished light, I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open…”Frankenstein may seem an outlandish tale, but Mary Shelley wrote it when science was alive with ideas about what differentiated the living from the dead. This was Vitalism, a belief that living things possessed some spark of life, some vital principle, perhaps even a soul, that distinguished the quick from the dead and lifted them above dull matter. Electricity was a very real candidate; when an Italian scientist called Luigi Galvani made dead frogs twitch by applying electricity he thought he had found it. Vitalists aimed at unlocking the secret of life itself and they raised questions about what life is that are unresolved to this day. With Patricia Fara, Fellow of Clare College and Affiliated Lecturer in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge University; Andrew Mendelsohn, Senior Lecturer in the History of Science and Medicine at Imperial College, University of London and Pietro Corsi, Professor of the History of Science at the University of Oxford.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode