In this engaging discussion, Jonah Goldberg, Editor-in-chief of The Dispatch, and Michael Brendan Dougherty, National Review contributor, delve into the provocative idea of the U.S. absorbing Canada and the outlandish notion of invading Greenland. They explore the implications of cultural assimilation and the complexities of national identities, while sharing humorous insights on geopolitical dynamics. With a keen eye on history and politics, they navigate the ethical debates surrounding these ideas, making for a lively and thought-provoking conversation.
The podcast discusses the portrayal of Kamala Harris as a transformative leader, highlighting skepticism towards claims of her campaign's historic significance.
A debate arises regarding the potential absorption of Canada by the U.S., emphasizing contrasting views on cultural integration and political implications.
Michael Brendan Dougherty argues for the voluntary Americanization of Greenland, advocating for strategic advantages while respecting the rights of Greenlanders.
Deep dives
Kamala Harris's Political Image
The discussion highlights the portrayal of Kamala Harris in a recent book as a groundbreaking political figure, emphasizing her campaign's supposed historic significance. The narrative characterizes her as a transformative candidate who rejuvenated the Democratic narrative with messages of joy and aspiration, shifting the political landscape in her favor. The book illustrates her as a motivational leader who inspired diverse voters, instilling hope and confidence, particularly in young girls. Despite this glowing portrayal, there is skepticism about the authenticity of such claims, given the contrasting realities of public perception and political dynamics.
The Debate on U.S.-Canada Relations
A significant topic of discussion revolves around whether the U.S. should absorb Canada into its territory, with differing viewpoints on the implications of such a move. One argument suggests that Americanizing Canada could enhance economic opportunities through the vast natural resources found there, while addressing concerns about immigration and cultural integration. The advocates believe that Canadians would adapt to American culture due to historical similarities, thereby enriching both nations. However, opponents argue that this assimilation is unrealistic, emphasizing the distinct cultural identity of Canadians and potential political consequences, such as a leftward shift in the Senate.
Michael Brendan Dougherty's Perspective on Greenland
Michael Brendan Dougherty presents a provocative argument in favor of the U.S. potentially invading Greenland, claiming it could provide substantial strategic advantages. He emphasizes the historical context of previous U.S. territorial acquisitions and draws parallels to the current geopolitical landscape, suggesting that taking control of Greenland could secure American interests against external threats. Dougherty argues for a voluntary approach to this hypothetical annexation, advocating for an Americanization effort that respects Greenlanders' self-determination, contrasting this with past coercive acquisitions. Although controversial, he believes that the integration of Greenland could enhance U.S. security and promote sustained economic growth.
Cultural Comparisons: Canada vs. America
A key point of the conversation examines the cultural distinction between Canadians and Americans, with assertions that Canadians define themselves largely in opposition to American identity. This cultural divergence raises questions about the feasibility of a seamless integration, as many view their national identity as unique and separate from that of the United States. Additionally, discussions touch on the historical context of American territorial expansions and how this relates to the potential integration of Canadian provinces into the U.S. The commentary reflects a broader skepticism about the likelihood of such an integration occurring peacefully given entrenched national sentiments.
Exploring the Implications of Territorial Expansion
The dialogue reflects on the broader implications of territorial expansion and the potential consequences for American foreign policy. Concerns arise regarding the normalization of taking control of nearby territories, as it could set a troubling precedent that influences global perceptions of U.S. intentions. There is also a discussion regarding the potential backlash from other countries if the U.S. pursues such aggressive policies, especially concerning the violation of international norms. Participants express that any move to acquire Greenland or absorb Canada would need to be handled delicately, ensuring respect for local populations and maintaining international relations.
On episode 77, Charles reads from a book about Kamala Harris he got for Christmas, and then talks to Jonah Goldberg about whether the United States should absorb Canada and to Michael Brendan Dougherty about why he's not appalled by the idea of invading Greenland.
The dial-up tone in the introduction was recorded by lintphishxand is used under a CC 3.0 License.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
