Jill Wine-Banks, former prosecutor and host of SistersInLaw, shares updates on the prosecutions of Trump world. Topics discussed include potential SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, $148 million ruling against Giuliani, attack on administrative law in abortion rights challenge, and more.
The potential SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity may have far-reaching effects on Trump's prosecutions and the outcome of his cases.
Rudy Giuliani was ordered to pay $148 million in damages for racially biased defamation, highlighting the consequences of making false and discriminatory claims.
The challenge to the FDA's actions on Miffer-Prisotone reflects a broader attack on the administrative state and could lead to restrictions on abortion access.
The cooperation status of Mark Meadows in the Georgia case remains uncertain, and his legal strategy and potential guilty plea are subjects of discussion.
Deep dives
Challenge to FDA's Action on Miffer-Prisotone
The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a challenge to the FDA's actions regarding the drug Miffer-Prisotone. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the FDA's initial approval was valid, but criticized the revised guidelines that allowed the drug to be administered without a doctor present and ordered by mail. The Court will also consider if the plaintiffs have standing to bring the case. The plaintiffs, a group of doctors, allege that the FDA approval infringes on their religious beliefs as it may require them to perform abortions. If the Court finds the plaintiffs lack standing, the case could be dismissed.
Potential Impact on Abortion Accessibility Nationwide
The challenge to the FDA's actions on Miffer-Prisotone, brought by an anti-abortion funding group, could have significant implications for reproductive rights. If successful, it could not only undermine the expertise of the FDA, but also lay the groundwork for a national ban on abortion. Miffer-Prisotone accounts for more than half of all abortions, and eliminating access to this medication would put immense pressure on surgical clinics. This challenge reflects a broader attack on the administrative state and could restrict abortion access even in states that have not enacted strict abortion bans.
The Intersection of Dobbs and the Miffer-Prisotone Case
There are similarities between the Miffer-Prisotone case and the recent Dobbs case. Both cases involve challenges to abortion rights, with the goal of potentially expanding state authority or restricting abortion access. The anti-abortion funding group behind the Miffer-Prisotone challenge aims to use this case to undermine the administrative state and push for a national abortion ban. If successful, this approach would significantly impact the availability of abortion, particularly considering the reliance on Miffer-Prisotone for more than half of all abortions.
Mark Meadows' Cooperation Status in the Georgia Case
Mark Meadows' cooperation status is discussed in relation to the Georgia case. The uncertainty surrounding his cooperation is explored, considering his indictment and previous indications of cooperation in Washington, D.C. The potential implications for Meadows' legal strategy and the likelihood of a guilty plea are examined.
Rudy Giuliani's Defamation Case Verdict
The recent verdict in the defamation case against Rudy Giuliani is discussed. The damages awarded to Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss and the distinction between compensatory and punitive damages are highlighted. The context of Giuliani's defamatory claims and the racial undertones associated with them are also analyzed.
The Concept of Separation of Church and State
The concept of separation of church and state is explained in relation to the First Amendment. The goal of prohibiting a government-established religion and ensuring freedom of religion without government interference is clarified. The broader scope of the First Amendment, including freedom of speech, press, and assembly, is also highlighted.
The Process of Writing Judicial Rulings
The process of writing judicial rulings is addressed, with a focus on the role of law clerks. While practices can vary, judges often engage in discussions with their clerks to analyze legal arguments and reach a decision. The extent of involvement of clerks in researching and drafting opinions varies among different judges.
The Possibility of Pardoning Hunter Biden
The question of whether President Biden can pardon Hunter Biden is explored. While he has the power to issue a pardon, the decision of whether to do so is examined in the context of the charges against Hunter Biden and their perceived political motivation. The possibility of a pardon and the potential implications for Joe Biden's presidency are discussed.
Jill Wine-Banks hosts #SistersInLaw to share the latest updates from the prosecutions of Trump world, including the attempts at removal by Mark Meadows, the effects of the potential SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, what constitutes obstruction of an official proceeding, and the trial schedule. The #Sisters then explain the factors behind the $148 million ruling against Rudy Giuliani for his racially biased defamation of Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman, before discussing the attack on administrative law contained in the mifepristone based challenge to abortion rights.
HelloFresh:
Enjoy a free breakfast item per box delivered right to your door for as long as you’re subscribed when you go to hellofresh.com/sistersfree and use promo code: SISTERSFREE
Thrive Causemetics:
For 20% off incredible clean and cause focused beauty products, go to thrivecausemetics.com/sisters
Blueland:
For 15% off your order of green cleaning products, go to blueland.com/sisters
Olive & June:
Get 20% off your mani system when you go to oliveandjune.com/sil and use promo code: SIL
Lomi:
Turn your food waste into plant-food at the press of a button with Lomi. Use the code SIL to save $50 at lomi.com/SIL
