Strict Scrutiny A Term for the Rich, the Reactionaries, and the Ruthless
65 snips
Jul 7, 2025 The hosts recap an eventful Supreme Court term, spotlighting significant rulings affecting marginalized groups. They discuss the tension between corporate interests and individual rights, diving into the implications of recent decisions. Controversies surrounding Justice Barrett and differing opinions on DEI within the court reveal deep divides. The absurdity of political branding, like Trump fragrances, adds humor to the mix. There’s also a deep dive into wrongful deportations, touching on systemic discrimination and immigration policy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Court Masks Substance with Procedure
- The Supreme Court uses procedural rulings to deliver substantive outcomes favoring corporate and government interests.
- This tactic masks impactful constitutional issues and undermines civil rights enforcement.
Procedural Bias Benefits The Powerful
- Procedural rules are selectively applied to advantage favored rights while burdening disfavored litigants.
- Justice Jackson dissents expose the Court's bias toward corporate and powerful interests.
Therapy Supports Mental Health
- Therapy offers practical coping strategies for stress, grief, and boundary-setting in work and personal lives.
- Online therapy platforms provide access to professionals accommodating busy schedules.
