Why did the plastic pollution talks in South Korea fail to yield a treaty?
Dec 4, 2024
auto_awesome
Satyarupa Shekhar, a public policy advocate specializing in plastics pollution and urban governance, discusses the recent UN negotiations on plastic pollution that failed to result in a treaty despite rising global plastic waste. She explores the stark divide between countries pushing for production caps versus oil-producing nations favoring waste management. The conversation highlights India's complex role in these discussions and critiques the fossil fuel industry's impact on climate and plastic policy, urging stronger commitments and responsibility shifts towards producers.
The inability to reach a compromise between countries advocating for reduced plastic production and those focusing on waste management stalled the treaty negotiations.
India's economic interests in plastic production contributed to its alignment with oil-producing nations, complicating the global push for stronger environmental commitments.
Deep dives
Stalemate in Global Plastic Negotiations
The recent meeting of the UN's Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on plastic pollution concluded without producing a legally binding treaty, despite the talks having commenced in March 2022. A significant divide emerged between about 100 countries advocating for limits on plastic production and a smaller group of oil-producing nations focusing solely on waste management. As a result of these opposing stances, the anticipated treaty remains elusive, with countries set to reconvene in the future while global plastic production continues to rise. Each year, the world is projected to generate 20 million metric tons of plastic waste, escalating the urgency for effective regulation and management.
Competing Proposals and Procedural Challenges
Various proposals, including an ambitious plan from Panama to create targets for reducing plastic production, were discussed, but none gained sufficient traction to yield a treaty. Some countries proposed procedural limitations on voting rights, complicating consensus-building efforts and mirroring past negotiations where certain countries leveraged their influence to sway outcomes. As conflicting interests emerged, especially from countries highly dependent on plastic production, a stalemate ensued that hampered substantive progress. The discussions highlighted the tension between developed and developing nations regarding financial responsibilities and specific commitments within the treaty framework.
India's Inconsistent Positioning
India's positioning in the negotiations reflected a complex balance of interests as it pushed against caps on plastic polymer production despite being a non-petrostate. With India being a major player in polymer production, it aligns more closely with oil-producing countries and appears to prioritize its economic opportunities over strong environmental commitments. This stance raises concerns of policy incoherence, further complicating India’s climate negotiating position established in earlier discussions like COP 29. India's approach underscores the challenge of balancing national economic interests with the growing necessity for international environmental responsibility.
Linking Plastics and Climate Crises
The discussions around plastic pollution illuminate deeper connections between climate change and the petrochemical industry, with fossil fuel demand shifting towards plastics manufacturing. As countries transition to electric vehicles and renewable energy, the fossil fuel sector seeks growth in petrochemical markets, raising alarm bells about the overlapping crises. Moreover, the systematic control of toxic chemicals and waste management remains inadequately addressed in proposed treaty texts, undermining fundamental regulatory efforts. Recognizing these interdependencies is essential for constructing effective agreements that tackle both climate and plastic pollution collectively.
The fifth meeting of the UN’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5) has ended without delivering a legally binding treaty to address global plastic pollution. The talks, which began in March 2022, were supposed to have produced a treaty by the end of 2024 but they haven’t.
The discussions saw a sharp divide between two camps – a large coalition of about 100 countries that wanted caps on plastic production, and a smaller set of oil-producing nations that wanted to focus only on plastic waste management. With the two camps unable to reach a compromise, the conference concluded on December 1 with an agreement to meet again at a later date. In the meantime, the world remains on track to keep producing 20 million metric tonnes of plastic waste every year, and triple plastic production by 2050.
So, what are the chances of a plastics treaty happening any time soon? What is the link between the climate change talks, the fossil fuel industry, and the plastics crisis? And why can’t the majority of countries that are serious about combating plastic pollution just go ahead without the small minority that are resisting an effective treaty?
Guest: Satyarupa Shekhar, a public policy advocate who works on urban governance, data justice, and plastics pollution.
Host: G. Sampath, Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu.
Edited by Jude Francis Weston
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode