

The Economy of Outrage
Conservative Influencers IRL
- Several people the hosts knew in college and real life became conservative influencers provoking rage online.
- Their extreme views contrasted sharply with their personal demeanor, causing cognitive dissonance for those who knew them.
Rage Bait Escalates Shock Value
- Rage bait leverages shock and offense to grab attention and provoke immediate anger.
- It escalates over time, requiring increasingly extreme content to sustain engagement and shock value.
Group Rage Amplifies Emotion
- Emotions like rage spread quickly in groups, amplifying individual feelings.
- Collective anger strengthens personal responses through social contagion and shared experiences.









This week, the girlies tackle rage bait: the content that’s engineered to make you mad and keep you scrolling. From gutting historic homes to incendiary Republican rhetoric, they explore how anger became a content strategy and why we keep falling for it. They trace the long history of provocation, once a way to challenge power and now just another feature of your FYP, breaking down how rage bait works, who benefits from it, and why nothing feels shocking anymore. Digressions include the beauty of riding a train, knowing conservative content creators in real life, and the age-old question: does being a woman count as rage bait?
We’re going on tour!!!! Find tickets at https://linktr.ee/binchtopia
This episode was produced by Julia Hava and Eliza McLamb and edited by Allison Hagan. Research assistance from Kylie Finnigan.
To support the podcast on Patreon and access 50+ bonus episodes, mediasodes, zoom hangouts and more, visit patreon.com/binchtopia and become a patron today.
SOURCES
$5.2m for a duct-taped banana: has the buyer of Maurizio Cattelan’s artwork slipped up?
10 Works of Art That Made People Really Mad
100 years later Duchamp’s ‘Fountain’ still influential
Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications.
Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities
Ape and Human Cognition: What's the Difference?
Chris Ofili: Can art still shock us?
Chris Ofili, The Holy Virgin Mary
Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moral Content
Facebook Manipulated User News Feeds To Create Emotional Responses
How A Urinal Changed Art History: The Duchamp Fountain
How Upton Sinclair’s ‘The Jungle’ Led to US Food Safety Reforms
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
How the Shock Jock Became the Outrage Jock
Marcel Duchamp: The Forefather of Conceptual Art
More Transparency and Less Spin
Online hate speech victimization: consequences for victims’ feelings of insecurity
Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment
The Art of Absurdity: Resurgence of Dadaism through Gen-Z memes.
The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads
The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind By Gustave Le Bon
The Cultural Politics of Emotion by Sara Ahmed
The Dada Era of Internet Memes
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment
“The Great Moon Hoax” is published in the “New York Sun”
The Shock Of The New: Art And The Century Of Change
The urinal that changed how we think
These Influencers Are Making Content to Make You Angry — And It’s Working
Understanding Media - The Extensions of Man
Walter Lippmann and Public Opinion