Noise and bias both contribute to inaccurate judgments, but noise is often more prevalent and harder to detect.
Organizations should encourage independent judgments and consider algorithms to reduce noise and address biases effectively.
Deep dives
What is noise and how is it different from bias?
Noise refers to the variability in judgments that should be identical. It exists when people make judgments about the same subject, but the judgments turn out to be different. In contrast, bias refers to consistent average errors in judgment. While bias represents systematic mistakes, noise represents the variability of judgments. Both bias and noise contribute to the inaccuracy of judgments, but noise is often more prevalent and harder to detect.
The causes and impacts of noise
There are three main sources of noise. First, there are consistent differences between judgments made by different individuals. Second, there is noise within an individual's judgments, which can be influenced by factors like mood or weather conditions. The third and most significant source of noise is what the authors refer to as pattern noise, which is the divergence in the ordering or prioritizing of judgments among individuals. This pattern noise arises from individuals projecting their own biases, experiences, and values onto judgments. The impacts of noise are far-reaching and can be seen in various fields such as business, criminal justice, healthcare, and decision-making in general. Noise leads to unfairness, inconsistency, and financial costs.
Addressing noise and the role of algorithms
In order to reduce noise, organizations should encourage independent judgments before reaching a consensus. Conformity and group dynamics often contribute to noise. Algorithms can play a significant role in reducing noise since they are consistent and not affected by biases. While biases can be present in algorithms due to the data they are trained on, algorithms offer an opportunity to detect and address biases more effectively. However, whether or not to rely on algorithms for decision-making depends on the specific context and values involved.
Daniel Kahneman shot to fame in 2002 when he won the Nobel prize in economics for his work on the psychology of human judgment and decision-making. In 2022 he joined us on the Intelligence Squared, alongside with his co-author Olivier Sibony, to discuss how businesses and governments can make smarter, swifter and more accurate decisions in our increasingly frenetic world. Our host for this event was journalist and presenter Ritula Shah.
We’d love to hear your feedback and what you think we should talk about next, who we should have on and what our future debates should be.
Send us an email or voice note with your thoughts to podcasts@intelligencesquared.com or Tweet us @intelligence2.
And if you’d like to get ad-free access to all Intelligence Squared podcasts, including exclusive bonus content, early access to new episodes and much more, become a supporter of Intelligence Squared today for just £4.99, or the equivalent in your local currency .
Just visit intelligencesquared.com/membership to find out more.