David Folkenflik, NPR's media correspondent, discusses the media's pivotal role in shaping U.S. elections. Marietje Schaake and Jennifer Huddleston debate big tech's overwhelming influence and the challenges of misinformation. David A. Kaplan offers reflections on the 2000 election's media landscape, highlighting how much has changed. They unpack the Washington Post’s controversial non-endorsement and the significant subscriber fallout, showcasing the tug-of-war between journalistic integrity and public expectations.
The Washington Post's decision to not endorse a presidential candidate sparked significant backlash, raising vital questions about media impartiality and subscriber trust.
Concerns about big tech's influence on political discourse highlight the necessity for regulation to combat misinformation and protect democratic values.
The evolving relationship between candidates and media, especially through social media, underscores the importance of adapting coverage strategies to engage younger voters effectively.
Deep dives
The Washington Post's Controversial Endorsement Decision
The Washington Post recently faced backlash after its editorial page editor announced there would be no presidential endorsement, a move surprising to many given the paper's critical coverage of former President Trump. The decision generated considerable outrage, leading to resignations from notable columnists, including Robert Kagan and Michelle Norris, and a swift cancellation of over 200,000 subscriptions. The publisher justified the lack of endorsement as a return to journalistic independence, claiming it empowers readers to make informed decisions without perceived bias from the newspaper. This incident highlights the intense scrutiny on media organizations, particularly in an election landscape where endorsements can significantly influence public perception and readership.
Media and the Impact of Political Misinformation
The ongoing U.S. election has raised concerns about the role of big tech platforms in disseminating political content, with discussions around the relationship between technology and misinformation becoming increasingly relevant. Journalism faces challenges in managing vast amounts of false information, and experts argue that while technology enables engagement, it can also facilitate harmful disinformation spread. Many believe that regulation is needed to address the power dynamics between large tech companies and democracy, as platforms continue to wield significant influence over political discourse and media narratives. The intersection of politics, technology, and journalism illustrates a complex ecosystem where trust and accurate information remain critical yet increasingly difficult to secure.
Responses to Trump's Influence on Media
Former President Trump’s relationship with the media has brought to light questions regarding journalistic integrity and the perceived division between news coverage and opinion. Some media experts argue that Trump’s hostile language towards journalists has compelled news organizations to reassess their editorial practices and their perceived independence. This climate has led to a discernible fear within media outlets about how coverage can impact their credibility and audience trust, particularly in a highly polarized political environment. Despite the challenges, many believe that the media must continue to strive for balanced reporting while navigating the complex demands from both political figures and the public.
Election Integrity and Journalism's Role
As the election approaches, the media's challenge extends beyond reporting to ensuring public understanding of electoral processes, especially concerning potential legal disputes. Historical contexts, such as the 2000 election, emphasize the need for clear communication from media about legal proceedings and their implications for election outcomes. Journalists are tasked with simplifying complex legal issues while remaining accurate, a balance that is increasingly crucial in an era of heightened scrutiny towards both the electoral process and media’s role within it. This responsibility is underscored by the expectation that elections will be fraught with challenges, making precise and truthful reporting essential for public trust.
Changing Dynamics in Election Coverage
The evolving landscape of campaign strategies encompasses how candidates utilize social media and traditional media to engage with voters. Candidates are increasingly aware of the significance of viral moments and online personas, which can boost their relatability and influence voter support. As demonstrated by the contrasting approaches of various campaigns, harnessing the power of digital platforms is becoming a key tactic to resonate with younger demographics and sway public sentiment. This shift necessitates that media organizations adapt their coverage strategies to account for the rapid changes in how political narratives are crafted and disseminated, reflecting a blend of traditional journalism and modern communication techniques.
This week, The Media Show broadcasts from Washington DC, and asks what the election tells us about the media's role in modern America.
The Washington Post finds itself at the heart of a debate on media impartiality after a reported loss of thousands of subscribers following its decision not to endorse a candidate. NPR's media correspondent, David Folkenflik, joins us to unpack the unfolding crisis.
With tech billionaires wielding significant influence, this election has seen figures like Elon Musk openly backing Donald Trump. Critics argue that big tech’s sway over public discourse has become too potent. Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow in technology policy at the Cato Institute, and Marietje Schaake, a former MEP now with Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, debate the issues.
For over 170 years, the Associated Press has been at the forefront of election coverage, calling winners across the nation. Anna Johnson, AP’s Washington bureau chief, explains how it does what might be "the single largest act of journalism in the world".
Also on the show, Lauren Egan, White House reporter for Politico, talks Ros through her job and what access she gets to the President. And David A Kaplan, former Newsweek legal affairs expert, reflects on the 2000 election—a time when the relationship between the media, the candidates and the public looked very different.
Presented by: Ros Atkins
Produced by: Simon Richardson
Assistant Producer: Lucy Wai
Sound: Ben Martin
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode