Wendell Johnson, who conducted an unethical experiment on vulnerable children, discusses the 'monster study' and its devastating impact of labeling children as stutterers. The podcast explores the dark history of unethical experiments and the emotional scars left on the participants.
The 'Monster Study' conducted by Wendell Johnson highlighted the harmful effects of labeling and negative expectations on children's speech, leading to worsening speech, self-consciousness, and behavioral problems.
The 'Monster Study' serves as a stark reminder of the importance of ethical considerations in scientific research, emphasizing the need to prioritize the well-being and rights of participants over questionable studies with no scientific validity.
Deep dives
The Monster Study: A Cruel Experiment on Stuttering
The podcast episode explores the infamous 'Monster Study' conducted in the field of psychology. The study aimed to test a theory proposed by Wendell Johnson that stuttering is not a physiological problem, but a habit fixated upon by anxious parents. The experiment was conducted on 22 children in a state orphanage, with half being told that they had a stutter and the other half being told their speech was fluent. The results showed that children who were told they had a stutter experienced worsening speech, self-consciousness, and behavioral problems, while those who were told their speech was fluent showed a slight improvement. The study harmed the children involved and had no scientific validity or practical use.
Ethical Issues and Regret
The podcast highlights the ethical issues surrounding the 'Monster Study', with the children being subjected to psychological harm and manipulation without informed consent. It is mentioned that the study was hushed up and not published due to its questionable nature. Both Wendell Johnson and Mary Tudor, the main figures behind the study, did not express regret at the time, although Mary Tudor later felt conflicted. The episode contextualizes the study within the historical framework of speech therapy and psychoanalysis, highlighting the positive contributions made by Wendell Johnson in the field of speech therapy despite his involvement in the controversial study.
Legacy and Lessons Learned
The podcast discusses the legacy of the 'Monster Study' and the lessons that can be gleaned from it. It is emphasized that the study's small sample size, lack of rigorous methodology, and fundamental disrespect for the children involved render its findings invalid and irrelevant. The episode suggests that each study should be evaluated individually for its validity and usefulness in today's context. The importance of ethical considerations in scientific research is underscored, urging researchers to prioritize the well-being and rights of participants above all else.
With relatively benign intentions, Wendell Johnson devised an experiment that would go on to be dubbed the Monster Study, inflicting terrible harm on a group of vulnerable and unsuspecting children.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode