Hank Rowen's groundbreaking philanthropy at Glassboro State College highlighted the importance of weak link strategies in higher education philanthropy, focusing on improving the foundation and less privileged institutions.
The current trend of strong link philanthropy perpetuates inequalities in higher education and overlooks the challenges faced by institutions serving a diverse student population. A more balanced approach embracing weak link strategies is needed for a profound impact on the higher education landscape.
Deep dives
The Philanthropy Gap
Hank Rowen, the founder of Inducto Therm, built a successful business and became wealthy. However, he chose to donate a significant amount of money ($100 million) to Glassboro State College in New Jersey, a public university with a depleted endowment. Rowen believed in improving the engineering education at the college and making a difference in the lives of many students. Despite his groundbreaking philanthropy, other wealthy donors opted to give large sums to prestigious and well-endowed universities, perpetuating the gap between elite and less privileged institutions.
Weak Link vs. Strong Link
Philanthropy in higher education tends to focus on strong link strategies, prioritizing elite schools and funding exclusive scholarships. This approach seeks to enhance the top-tier institutions and target the best and brightest students. However, the analogy of soccer and basketball indicates that weak link strategies, supporting the improvement of the least skilled players, can bring about more significant overall results. Hank Rowen's investment in Glassboro State College demonstrated the impact of focusing on strengthening the foundation rather than solely enhancing the already successful.
The Weak Link Approach
Hank Rowen believed in supporting weaker players and institutions for greater systemic improvement. He wanted to make change by bolstering the forty-five percent player, thereby positively impacting the whole team. However, many influential donors, like Ken Griffin, who gave $150 million to Harvard, tend to emphasize strong link giving, focusing on the best performers in the field. This approach perpetuates inequalities within higher education and fails to address the challenges faced by institutions that serve a more diverse student population.
The Need for Balanced Philanthropy
The current trend of strong link philanthropy, predominantly supporting prestigious and wealthy universities, may not be the most effective use of philanthropic funds. The system requires a more balanced approach, with donations embracing weak link strategies that uplift less privileged institutions and students. By spreading philanthropic resources across a broader spectrum of schools, donors can make a more equitable and profound impact on the higher education landscape.
In the early ’90s, Hank Rowan gave $100 million to a tiny public university in Glassboro, New Jersey: not Harvard, not Yale, not even to his alma mater, MIT. What was Rowan thinking? And why has it proven so difficult for other philanthropists to follow his lead?