Tess Wingard, a medieval historian and author of "Unclean Beasts," joins to unravel the hidden stories of lesbian relationships in the medieval era. They discuss the surprising documentation of same-sex love, including a scandal involving a dildo in a court case. The conversation highlights the male-run church's fears over nuns' closeness and challenges historians face in uncovering these intimate histories. Wingard also touches on intriguing cases like Katharina Hetzeldorf, showcasing how courage and love defied the oppressive norms of their time.
Medieval evidence of lesbian relationships is scarce, yet artifacts like the Etchingham-Oxenbridge memorial challenge assumptions about women's emotional bonds.
The Fourth Lateran Council enforced structured confessional practices, reshaping societal attitudes towards sexuality and scrutinizing non-reproductive sexual behaviors.
Deep dives
Medieval Lesbian Evidence
Historical records lack substantial evidence of lesbian relationships prior to the 1970s, making it challenging to explore queer history. However, artifacts such as the brass memorial for Elizabeth Etchingham and Agnes Oxenbridge provide hints at medieval lesbian lives, portraying two women in a manner typically reserved for married couples. This memorial, which shows the women gazing into each other's eyes rather than looking outward, suggests a significant emotional bond that transcends conventional friendship. Such discoveries encourage historians to rethink the evidence needed to acknowledge the existence of lesbian relationships during this period.
Shifting Sexual Norms
The Fourth Lateran Council in the 13th century significantly influenced beliefs about sexuality, making confession a yearly obligation, which in turn shaped attitudes towards various sexual acts. Before this council, confessional practices were less formalized, allowing for a broader spectrum of sexual behavior without strict oversight. With more structured confessional guidelines emerged a heightened scrutiny of sexual morality, leading to the classification of behaviors that deviated from reproduction-focused sexual norms. This shift also marked the beginning of more detailed classifications of sinful acts, which eventually included many sexual practices that existed outside traditional heterosexual relationships.
Judith Bennett's Influence
Judith Bennett introduced the concept of the 'lesbian-like' to broaden how historians search for evidence of same-sex relationships. By suggesting that historians should seek out emotional or intimate connections beyond explicit sexual acts, Bennett opened the door to recognizing the presence of women who may not have partaken in the same societal roles as men. This perspective allows for the consideration of various forms of intimacy, such as written expressions or emotional closeness between women, as valid evidence of queer relationships. Such an approach helps address the historical record's difficulty in capturing the complexities of women’s relationships in earlier societies.
The Historical Treatment of Gender and Sexuality
Medieval views on sexuality differed significantly from contemporary understandings, lacking structured identities like 'straight' or 'gay.' The term 'sodomite' was broadly used to classify sexual behaviors that were deemed immoral, but never employed as a self-identification term. This categorization posed challenges in understanding the experiences of women involved in same-sex relationships, as evidence surfaced mainly through legal cases where intimacy and sexual acts were often conflated with criminality. Consequently, reflections on cases such as Katharina Hetzeldorf highlight the complexities of gender identity and the struggle to reconcile modern perspectives with historical realities.
How do you begin to look for examples of lesbians in the medieval period?
Even though it was deeply frowned upon by the powers that be, the clues are very much there... if you know where to look.
What examples do we have? How did the male-run church respond to fears that nuns were getting too close for their liking? And how did a 13th century court react when a dildo was presented in a case against a woman accused of sodomy?
Joining Kate today is medieval historian Tess Wingard to help us find out more. You can find out more about Tess's work here: https://tesswingard.wordpress.com/
This episode was edited and produced by Stuart Beckwith. The senior producer was Charlotte Long.
All music from Epidemic Sounds/All3 Media.
Sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe.