Shameless Popery cover image

Shameless Popery

#119 Does St. Ignatius Disprove the Papacy? - Joe Heschmeyer

Nov 5, 2024
Explore the intriguing arguments surrounding the Papacy based on St. Ignatius of Antioch's writings. Discover the implications of Ignatius's letters, which notably lack mention of a Bishop of Rome. Delve into his acknowledgment of the ecclesiastical hierarchy and the theological significance behind his structured church perspective. The discussion also examines how context shapes our understanding of authority and governance within the early Church. These insights challenge modern interpretations and highlight the complexities of early Christianity.
00:00

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Joe Heschmeyer critiques the Ignatian argument against the Papacy, suggesting it misinterprets the context of St. Ignatius's writings.
  • The podcast emphasizes St. Ignatius's advocacy for a threefold church order, highlighting the significance of bishops and established governance structures.

Deep dives

The Ignatian Argument Against the Papacy

The discussion centers around the so-called Ignatian argument, which is used by some Protestant apologists and skeptical Catholic scholars to question the historical continuity of the papacy. This argument claims that since the letters of St. Ignatius of Antioch do not mention a bishop of Rome, it implies that such an office did not exist during that time. Proponents of this view, including scholars like Dr. Jerry Walls, use this notion of silence to suggest that the papal lineage from St. Peter to Pope Francis is not historically valid. However, this reading overlooks the context of Ignatius's letters and the possibility that bishops could have existed in Rome prior to the mid-2nd century, though not explicitly stated in these writings.

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
App store bannerPlay store banner