Performance-enhancing drug use in sports presents moral dilemmas that are context-dependent, not solely black and white.
The Jesuit order's casuistry approach aids in analyzing complex ethical issues by considering specific circumstances over broad principles.
Deep dives
Exploring the Failure of Apologies in Sports
Athletes like Andy Pettet face scrutiny for using performance-enhancing drugs to recover from injuries, causing confusion and backlash for their apologies. By examining cases like Pettet's against established standards such as Tommy John's restorative surgery, it becomes evident that what may seem like a moral breach can be context-dependent.
The Jesuit Approach to Moral Dilemmas
The Jesuit order, known for its intellectual rigor, innovatively applies casuistry to address complex issues such as novel ethical problems. Drawing on historical cases like maritime insurance controversies, their method involves breaking down each case based on specific circumstances rather than relying solely on broad principles.
Casuistry in Modern Contexts: Orlando Shooting Response
James Martin's application of casuistry extends beyond traditional ethics to analyze the Catholic Church's response to the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando. By focusing on the specific details of the situation and individuals involved, Martin highlights the importance of understanding and addressing nuanced moral dilemmas.
Consolation and Accompaniment in Ethical Discourse
Through the lens of Jesuit teachings, James Martin advocates for a compassionate approach in dealing with LGBTQ+ individuals within the Catholic Church. Rather than engaging solely on doctrinal debates, Martin emphasizes the significance of consoling and accompanying marginalized communities to foster understanding and inclusivity.
Revisionist History tries to make sense of the conundrum of PED use in baseball, using the 500-year-old philosophical techniques of St. Ignatius. Part one of a three-part series on the moral reasoning of the Jesuit order.