Epidural Steroids for Cervical and Lumbar Radicular Pain and Spinal Stenosis
Feb 20, 2025
auto_awesome
Dr. Carmel Armon, a neurologist at Loma Linda University, discusses the effectiveness of epidural steroid injections in treating cervical and lumbar radicular pain. She emphasizes the contrast between anecdotal evidence and clinical studies, revealing the injections provide limited long-term relief, with modest short-term pain reduction. The conversation highlights the complexities of pain management and the need for further research to clarify treatment outcomes and set realistic patient expectations.
Epidural steroid injections provide only modest short-term relief for cervical and lumbar radicular pain, with diminishing effects after three months.
The need for standardized outcome measures and reliable control treatments in future research is essential for improving clinical practice guidelines on ESIs.
Deep dives
Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections
Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) demonstrate limited efficacy for managing cervical and lumbar radicular pain, as well as spinal stenosis. Studies indicate that while they may modestly reduce pain for some patients for up to three months, their effect diminishes over time. For pain relief, the number needed to treat (NNT) is four for short-term outcomes, meaning that only one in four patients experiences significant improvement, leaving the majority unaffected compared to control treatments. Additionally, for long-term disability reduction, the NNT rises to nine, suggesting most individuals do not gain substantial long-term benefits from ESIs.
Understanding 'Limited Efficacy'
The term 'limited efficacy' encompasses both the effect size and its measurement based on clinically meaningful differences. With a significant number of patients experiencing temporary relief, the implications for long-term pain management remain complex, as many return to baseline levels of pain within three to six months. Clinicians are advised to manage patient expectations by providing clear information about the likely short-lived benefits of ESIs, particularly in the context of more comprehensive pain management strategies. This approach is crucial, given the high prevalence of low back and neck pain that significantly impacts patients' lives.
Need for Improved Clinical Guidelines
Current reviews reaffirm previous findings regarding the modest benefits of ESIs, highlighting the need for more robust clinical practice guidelines. While the systematic review provided valuable insights into potential outcomes of ESIs, it could not form conclusive practice recommendations due to the variability and complexity of existing data. Recommendations for future research emphasize the necessity of standardizing outcome measures to reflect minimally clinically meaningful improvements, as well as establishing a reliable control treatment, such as saline injections. These steps would likely enhance the understanding of ESIs, paving the way for better-informed clinical decisions in pain management.
Dr. Alex Menze talks with Dr. Carmel Armon about the efficacy of epidural steroid injections in cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis and radiculopathies, assessing short-term and long-term improvements in pain and disability.