The Thomistic Institute
Who Am I to Judge? Politics and the Problem of Moral Relativism | Prof. Francis Beckwith
Jun 19, 2020
Prof. Francis Beckwith discusses moral relativism and political disagreements, contrasting it with moral objectivism. They explore moral disagreement using examples like interpretations of legal clauses and differing views on abortion. The podcast delves into the concepts of moral objectivism and relativism, justifications for moral standards, and the influence of natural law on moral decision-making.
58:56
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Moral claims differ from preferences, clarifying ethical debates.
- Disagreement in moral beliefs doesn't disprove objective moral truths.
Deep dives
Distinction Between Moral and Preference Claims
Making a clear differentiation between moral claims and preference claims, the podcast highlights how moral statements, such as condemning torture, carry a different weight than mere preference statements like ice cream flavor choices. People often confuse these categories, leading to misunderstandings in ethical debates.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
