AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The Thomistic Institute
Who Am I to Judge? Politics and the Problem of Moral Relativism | Prof. Francis Beckwith
Jun 19, 2020
Prof. Francis Beckwith discusses moral relativism and political disagreements, contrasting it with moral objectivism. They explore moral disagreement using examples like interpretations of legal clauses and differing views on abortion. The podcast delves into the concepts of moral objectivism and relativism, justifications for moral standards, and the influence of natural law on moral decision-making.
58:56
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Moral claims differ from preferences, clarifying ethical debates.
- Disagreement in moral beliefs doesn't disprove objective moral truths.
Deep dives
Distinction Between Moral and Preference Claims
Making a clear differentiation between moral claims and preference claims, the podcast highlights how moral statements, such as condemning torture, carry a different weight than mere preference statements like ice cream flavor choices. People often confuse these categories, leading to misunderstandings in ethical debates.
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode