How To Academy Podcast
Daniel Dennett v. Robert Sapolsky - Do We Have Free Will?
Jan 24, 2024
Philosopher Daniel Dennett and neurobiologist Robert Sapolsky debate whether human beings have free will. Sapolsky argues that free will is an illusion, while Dennett believes it is compatible with scientific knowledge. They discuss factors influencing decision-making, the role of biology and environment in shaping behavior, the link between free will and genetic attributes, responsibility, and the concept of being 'wired wrong' or 'wired right'.
01:11:32
Episode guests
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Decisions and choices are influenced by biology, environment, and past experiences, challenging the notion of free will.
- Self-control and the ability to be reasoned with are indications of free will, and education plays a vital role in developing self-control.
Deep dives
Free will is argued to be a dangerous illusion
In this podcast episode, Daniel Dennett, a philosopher, and Robert Sapolsky, a biologist, engage in a debate about the existence of free will. Sapolsky argues that free will is an illusion, concluding that decisions and choices are influenced by biology, environment, and past experiences. He highlights the importance of understanding the numerous factors that shape individuals' behavior. Dennett, however, maintains that free will is real and essential for personal responsibility and self-control. He emphasizes the evolutionary development of self-control and the ability to make choices based on values and judgment. The audience showed a slight shift towards determinism after the debate.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
