Slate Daily Feed What Next | Trump’s Revenge Tour Is Here
Sep 30, 2025
Ankush Khardori, a senior writer for POLITICO Magazine and former federal prosecutor, joins the discussion to dissect the implications of Trump's indictment against James Comey. He argues that the thin evidence raises questions about its legitimacy, suggesting the charges are politically motivated. Khardori examines Trump's longstanding grudge against Comey, the unusual choices for prosecutors, and the potential blowback for the Trump administration. The conversation also touches on accountability strategies for Democrats and the risks of politicizing the DOJ.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Weak Case, Big Institutional Risk
- The Comey indictment is procedurally weak, thin, and poorly written according to Ankush Khardori.
- Even so, a sitting president bringing such charges is dangerous because it weaponizes DOJ authority for political ends.
Reciprocal Accusations As A Strategy
- Trump deliberately flattens accusations by reciprocating attacks to neutralize them rhetorically.
- That strategy turns corruption claims into mutual mudslinging and erodes accountability.
Sudden Push After U.S. Attorney Shakeup
- The investigation into Comey accelerated publicly only recently, tied to a U.S. attorney shakeup.
- Reporters noted a looming five-year statute of limitations that forced quick action.