Why are we all so Chronically Online? ft. Rebecca Jennings
Dec 21, 2022
auto_awesome
Explore the addictive nature of outrage and political hobbyism on social media. Discuss the weaponization of social media and the lack of gatekeepers. Examine the dominance of negative and divisive content online. Explore the fixation on small differences between Millennials and Gen Z. Share personal experiences of going viral and facing both praise and backlash. Discuss the hypersexualized portrayal of women in comic book art. Critique specific controversial tweets and discuss online controversies.
Social media enables extreme discourse and polarization.
Online culture thrives on controversy, making it difficult to find common ground.
Viral outrage can stem from innocuous posts and have significant consequences on individuals.
Deep dives
The fascination with social media train wrecks
The podcast episode explores why people are so enthralled by social media train wrecks. It discusses the addictive nature of outrage, the role of social media in promoting political hobbyism, and the idea that humans have always been attracted to controversy. The episode also touches on the negative impact of viral outrage mechanisms and the ways in which online platforms enable extreme discourse and polarization.
Chronically online episodes and the allure of outrage
The episode highlights some of the funniest and most absurd episodes of chronically online discourse on social media. It examines the phenomenon of extreme reactions to normal posts, the reasons behind the viral spread of insane posts, and the cycle of outrage and reaction that characterizes chronically online discourse. The discussion also delves into the implications of this kind of discourse for society and the difficulty of finding common ground in a culture war-driven online environment.
The challenge of discussing online discourse
The episode explores the difficulty of discussing certain topics without being sucked into the culture war. It addresses the fine line between engaging with extreme views and enabling them, and the challenge of finding common ground amidst the amplification of extreme opinions. The discussion also touches on the impact of social media on the way we communicate and the need to critically examine our own engagement with online discourse.
The toxoplasma of rage and the proliferation of divisive content
The episode references the concept of the 'toxoplasma of rage,' where only the most controversial and divisive content goes viral. It discusses how this dynamic extends beyond social media to various areas like politics, sports, and cultural fandoms. The conversation reflects on the nature of online discourse, the polarization of opinions, and the challenge of finding common ground in an environment that thrives on controversy.
The allure and consequences of going viral
The episode delves into the allure of going viral and the consequences it can have. It highlights instances of viral outrage that start from seemingly innocuous posts or tweets, and the repercussions of becoming the main character in online discourse. The discussion touches on the impact of social media on our interactions and the complexities of engaging with extreme views in an ever-connected digital world.
Everybody loves a good social media trainwreck - posts so bad that you can't look away. But how did we get like this? Have we always been like this, and social media just gave us a new way to express it? Vox's Rebecca Jennings joins the show to talk about 'Chronically Online' discourse. We talk about why people say the insane things they say on Twitter, TikTok, and other platforms, why we can't resist a good dogpile on those people, and what it means for our culture and our politics.
To make sure you hear every episode, join our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/neoliberalproject. Patrons get access to exclusive bonus episodes, our sticker-of-the-month club, and our insider Slack. Become a supporter today!
Got questions for the Neoliberal Podcast? Send them to mailbag@cnliberalism.org