
Robert Wright's Nonzero The Minneapolis Shooting Rorschach Test (Robert Wright & Paul Bloom)
14 snips
Jan 13, 2026 Paul Bloom, a renowned psychologist and author known for his work on moral psychology, joins Robert Wright to explore the Minneapolis shooting's implications. They dive into how differing perspectives color interpretations of the incident. The duo discusses the behavior of protesters, police reactions, and the questions raised by video evidence. They also challenge political narratives surrounding figures like Trump and J.D. Vance, debunking the notion of consistent ideological beliefs. Bloom even touches on the controversial tactics of ICE and the complex psychology behind self-interest.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Video As A Political Rorschach
- The Renee Good video acts as a political Rorschach test where viewers see what their politics predispose them to see.
- Robert Wright argues one angle of the video undermines claims she tried to run over the agent due to the car's steering behavior.
Camera Angle Undermines Run-Over Claim
- Wright highlights that from the shooter's camera the car is pointing at him then she sharply turns the wheel, which undercuts the "run him over" claim.
- He concludes the vantage captured in that video makes running him over implausible.
Reflexes Versus Deliberate Belief
- Split-second reflexes can differ between perceiving an intentional attack and a dangerous situation, altering behavior without deliberation.
- Wright suggests the agent may have reflexively reacted to perceived danger rather than a considered belief she intended to kill him.






