

What's next for Iran, with the New York Times' Thomas L. Friedman
58 snips Jul 3, 2025
Thomas L. Friedman, a New York Times columnist and expert on Middle Eastern affairs, shares his insights on the recent Israel-Iran conflict and its ramifications. He discusses how Iran emerged weaker despite claims of survival, and how Netanyahu secured political gains through military action. The dialogue examines Trump's foreign policy victories, the impact on Gaza, and the complexities of Iran's nuclear ambitions. Friedman urges a focus on Israeli-Palestinian relations, highlighting the need for sustainable solutions amidst ongoing tensions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Significance of Iran Defeat
- The defeat of Iran's threat network has reshaped the Middle East akin to the 1967 Arab defeat.
- Reducing Iran's malign influence benefits regional and global stability but future dynamics remain uncertain.
Iran's Internal Conflict Post-War
- Internal debate in Iran is brewing between rushing for a nuclear bomb and seeking a diplomatic deal to advance the country.
- U.S. actions can influence these factions but only Iranians can enact regime change.
Different U.S. and Israeli Approaches to Iran
- Trump treats diplomacy with Iran and Russia similarly as deal-making disputes, which risks oversimplifying complex motives.
- Netanyahu seeks regime change in Iran, while Trump aims to engage Iran's moderate forces diplomatically.