That Triathlon Show Q&A #10 - Why 80/20 training is NOT the best way to train for time-crunched age-group triathletes
Nov 29, 2018
51:09
Q&A #10 - Why 80/20 training is NOT the best way to train for time-crunched age-group triathletes
- What do you miss out on, if anything, by following a sweet spot based training approach versus an 80/20 approach?
- Should you keep your TSS constant as you change your approach to training?
- Flaws in studies used as evidence of 80/20 training
- That Triathlon Show website
- Coaching
- Training Plans
- Case study: How David qualified for Kona by training smarter and getting the details right | EP#130
- 80/20 Triathlon (revisited) with Matt Fitzgerald | EP#152
- 80/20 Triathlon: Get Faster By Training Slower with David Warden | EP#121
- Q&A #3 - The validity of 80-20, how easy is easy, and different types of interval workouts
- Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training
- Training-Intensity Distribution During an Ironman Season: Relationship With Competition Performance
- Six weeks of a polarized training-intensity distribution leads to greater physiological and performance adaptations than a threshold model in trained cyclists