

The Surprising History of the Supreme Court Footnote
Sep 16, 2024
Peter Charles Hoffer, Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia, dives into the quirky world of Supreme Court footnotes. He shares how footnotes influence legal precedent and public perceptions of court decisions. The discussion humorously touches on the challenges of reading and even ADHD, while also critiquing Justice Alito's historical interpretations. Hoffer argues for the vital role of trained historians in jurisprudence, underscoring how footnotes shape legal narratives and impact landmark rulings.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Intro
00:00 • 2min
The Evolution of Footnotes in Supreme Court Opinions
01:32 • 8min
The Curious Footnotes of Law
09:07 • 4min
Interpreting History: Law vs. Scholarship
13:04 • 15min
Convenient Meal Solutions for Busy Lives
27:35 • 3min
Historians as Public Pundits
30:19 • 12min
Intellectual Sparring in Supreme Court Footnotes
41:49 • 2min
The Power of Footnotes in Law
43:48 • 7min
Engaging Discussion on Supreme Court Footnotes and Special Offers
50:32 • 2min