

Your Questions Answered: Trump vs. the Rule of Law
11 snips Aug 11, 2025
Ruth Marcus, a legal issues writer for The New Yorker, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, a Harvard law professor, dive deep into the legal controversies surrounding Trump. They tackle birthright citizenship, examining the Supreme Court's recent rulings and the potential erosion of voting rights. The duo debates the legality of ICE practices and the challenges naturalized citizens face. With contrasting views on judicial authority, they explore how politics clash with the rule of law in these unprecedented times and invite listeners to ponder future legal complexities.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Warrants Aren't Always Required
- You don't necessarily need a warrant for searches; probable cause can suffice.
- Jeannie Suk Gersen notes police officers can act on probable cause without a judge.
State Bans Clash With Federal Supremacy
- If a city bans federal practices like mask use, it triggers federal supremacy conflicts.
- Jeannie Suk Gersen says courts would have to decide whether federal law justifies mask uses.
Denaturalization Has Legal Limits
- Denaturalization can target naturalized citizens who obtained citizenship by fraud.
- Ruth Marcus stresses natural-born citizens cannot be denaturalized under current law.