Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus, a legal analyst for The New Yorker, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, a Harvard constitutional law professor, dive into the legal chaos during the Trump era. They tackle controversial topics like birthright citizenship and ICE practices, debating the implications of recent rulings. Listeners’ questions reveal the unprecedented nature of these legal challenges, prompting a discussion about the evolving relationship between the courts and the executive branch. They emphasize the importance of understanding these dynamics in today’s political climate.

Ruth Marcus, a former Washington Post columnist and author, joins Yale Law School's James Forman, an expert on mass incarceration, alongside Stephen Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations. They dive into the implications of Trump's recent bombings in Iran and a pivotal New York Democratic primary win for Zohran Mamdani. The trio discusses a whistleblower's shocking revelations about Trump’s judicial nominees and the ongoing ethical dilemmas within the Justice Department, highlighting the urgent need for accountability in politics.

Ruth Marcus, a contributing writer at The New Yorker specializing in law, joins to dissect Trump’s 'revenge tour' and the indictment of James Comey. They explore how Trump's retaliatory strategies challenge legal norms and might endanger public officials and their families. Marcus reveals the indictment's weak legal foundation and discusses why Comey was targeted first. The conversation dives into the implications of Trump's tactics on the Justice Department and questions whether the cycle of political retribution can be broken.

Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The New Yorker and author of "Supreme Ambition," discusses her critical experience at the Washington Post and her insights on Trump’s legal strategies. She analyzes how Trump's expansive view of presidential power faces rebukes in lower courts but gains unexpected support from the Supreme Court. Marcus questions whether the conservative majority will ultimately check Trump's authority or yield to it, highlighting the implications for constitutional rights and judicial integrity.

Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The New Yorker and author of *Supreme Ambition*, dives deep into the turbulent relationship between Trump and the judiciary. She discusses how Trump's legal strategies seem to be backfiring in lower courts while the Supreme Court exhibits surprising deference to presidential power. Marcus highlights crucial immigration cases and the implications of recent rulings, questioning the Court's checks on Trump. With a conservative majority, she explores what this may mean for the balance of power moving forward.