Mia Sato, a reporter for The Verge, explores the intriguing dynamic of influencer culture on platforms like Amazon. She delves into the legal battle between two influencers over alleged content copying, highlighting the competitive nature and strain of the influencer lifestyle. The conversation also uncovers the impact of social media algorithms on originality and monetization strategies. Sato examines how aesthetics and personal branding influence financial success in this increasingly crowded space, raising critical questions about creativity and commerce.
The lawsuit between two Amazon influencers highlights the challenges of copyright in an industry where content aesthetics often overlap due to algorithm-driven rewards.
The Amazon Influencer Program incentivizes a homogenous content style, raising concerns about originality and the financial implications of brand identity among creators.
Deep dives
The Rise of Amazon Influencers
Amazon influencers like Sydney Nicole Gifford and Alyssa Scheel curate content that promotes products available on Amazon, focusing primarily on aesthetics and relatable lifestyles. Both influencers create videos featuring recommendations of various items, usually in neutral tones and minimalist styles, attracting followers who aspire to emulate their looks and lifestyles. Their success in the Amazon Influencer Program hinges on viewer engagement, where they earn a commission on sales driven by their recommendations. This ecosystem incentivizes a homogenous style of content that can lead to overlap among influencers, raising questions about originality and creativity in a crowded digital marketplace.
A Legal Battle Over Influence
The lawsuit between Gifford and Scheel centers around allegations of copyright infringement and misappropriation, with Gifford claiming that Scheel copied not just her content but her overall aesthetic and style. Gifford argues that this duplication harmed her financially by diminishing her unique brand identity and follower count. In court, the complexities of determining what constitutes copyrightable content in influencer culture come into play, as similar aesthetics are commonplace across many creators. This case embodies broader issues within the influencer industry, where the lines of inspiration and imitation can blur, making it difficult to ascertain the ownership of personal brands.
Amazon's Influence and the Content Ecosystem
Amazon plays a significant role in shaping the content produced by its influencers, providing them lists of promoted items and trending search terms, which inadvertently encourages a similar style among creators. Influencers respond to these incentives by featuring popular products, leading to a lack of diversity in the type of content that circulates online. This trend introduces competition among influencers who vie for viewer attention while adhering to a specific aesthetic that appears to resonate with audiences. The algorithms that dictate visibility and engagement create a cycle where similar content is rewarded, further complicating the landscape of originality within the influencer market.
One influencer working for Amazon sued another influencer who works for Amazon for creating content that looks too similar to theirs. But with how the algorithms work and reward, was this an inevitability? What does this mean for the economics of the influencer position?
Guest: Mia Sato, reporter covering platforms and communities for The Verge.
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.