In this engaging discussion, Ellie Sacklet-Vala, Head of non-ferrous metal pricing at Argus Media, dives into the controversial valuation of Ukraine's rare earth minerals amidst the ongoing conflict. She delves into the stark differences between claimed and actual U.S. aid to Ukraine, as well as the implications for defense spending in the UK. Adding a quirky twist, the conversation explores the fascinating anatomy of elephant trunks. Expect insights into geopolitics, funding challenges, and a sprinkle of humor throughout!
The US aid to Ukraine is greatly overstated, with actual contributions closer to $122 billion compared to the claimed $350 billion.
The UK plans to increase defense spending to 2.5% of GDP, potentially funded by cuts in foreign aid, raising welfare system concerns.
Deep dives
Misleading Aid Figures for Ukraine
The claim that the US has provided Ukraine with $350 billion in aid is significantly overstated. Research from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy indicates that the actual amount is closer to $122 billion. This figure encompasses all aid delivered or clearly specified, rather than promises that remain unfulfilled. Interestingly, Europe has contributed slightly more, with over $142 billion in support, which illustrates a more complex and less one-sided international aid landscape than suggested.
The Reality of Defense Spending
In response to geopolitical shifts, the UK Prime Minister announced an increase in defense spending from 2.3% to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, potentially funded by cuts in foreign aid budgets. This aims to reflect the changing security landscape, but it raises questions about the 'peace dividend' which allowed for greater funding in welfare programs after years of reduced defense expenses. Historical spending patterns show that defense costs have significantly declined since the mid-20th century, allowing for increased investment in healthcare and social security. Hence, any future increases will likely require substantial cuts in other public services or tax increases, thereby impacting the broader welfare system.
Clarifying the Rare Earths Debate
The controversy surrounding the US's demand for $500 billion worth of Ukraine's rare earth minerals lacks substantial backing, as these elements are neither rare nor accurately quantified in that figure. Experts clarify that while rare earths are essential for various industries, the valuation of $500 billion seems vastly exaggerated compared to the global market’s true worth, which is estimated at only around $12.4 billion. Furthermore, the difficulties in accessing and processing these minerals complicate the potential for quick profit. This situation underscores the geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains and highlights the importance of securing diverse access to key resources.
Has the US really sent Ukraine $350 billion for its war effort? Is a $500billion cut of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals a good deal? How will the UK fund the governments ambitions to raise defence spending to 3%? But most important of all - how many muscles are in an elephant’s trunk?
Presenter: Tim Harford
Series Producer: Charlotte McDonald
Reporter: Lizzy McNeill
Producers: Nathan Gower and Josh McMinn
Sound Mix: James Beard
Editor: Richard Vadon
Production Co-Ordinator: Brenda Brown
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode