The Intelligence from The Economist Fits and starts: SARS-CoV-2’s origin
Aug 19, 2021
Natasha Loder, The Economist's health policy editor, delves into the uncertain origins of SARS-CoV-2, discussing the challenges of uncovering the truth behind its emergence amidst political pressures from China. Matthew Hulhaus, the British politics correspondent, shares insights into Boris Johnson's struggle to align his environmental promises with the automotive industry's impact. They explore the race towards electric vehicles and the legacy of fried chicken, highlighting its complex cultural history and significance in social dynamics.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
China's Influence
- The WHO investigation was limited to a zoonotic origin, influenced by China.
- China promoted the unlikely theory of the virus originating from frozen food, possibly to deflect blame.
Further Investigation Needed
- The WHO report reveals little; further investigation is needed.
- The WHO seeks more data on animal markets, human studies, and lab audits, but China refuses to cooperate.
Earlier Circulation
- Evidence suggests COVID-19 circulated earlier than December 2019, with cases found in Italy as early as September 2019.
- This raises questions about undetected circulation in Wuhan and the close ties between Wuhan and Milan through the clothing trade.