God & the Fate of Judas, Natural Disasters, and Other Evils | Your Questions on the Problem of Evil

May 22, 2025

Dive into a thought-provoking exploration of divine foreknowledge and evil. Unpack whether God's salvation plan necessitated sin and how ethical frameworks shape our understanding of morality. Discover insights on the complexities of human freedom versus divine necessity, especially regarding Judas's role. Delve into how Eastern interpretations view God's permissive will amidst suffering and natural disasters, while contemplating theodicy and the human experience of pain. This engaging discussion challenges traditional views and broadens the conversation on faith and ethics.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Necessity and Free Will in Crucifixion

The crucifixion, while central to salvation, involved human free choices rather than divine necessity forcing evil acts.
Medieval philosophy distinguishes types of necessity to reconcile divine foreknowledge with human freedom.

INSIGHT

Eastern View on Divine Foreknowledge

Eastern Church Fathers understand divine foreknowledge as knowledge of actual future realities, not as knowledge of mere hypotheticals.
God's foreknowledge is based on knowing creatures' real dispositions, harmonizing with their freedom.

INSIGHT

Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology

Utilitarianism judges acts solely by pleasant outcomes, while deontology focuses on universal moral maxims.
Both present false dilemmas; numerous other ethical systems address morality beyond these extremes.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Get notified when registration Dr. Jacobs’ class goes live: https://forms.gle/pKYCWnHA1gToDxZv9

In this Q&A episode, Dr. Jacobs addresses ten challenging questions about the problem of evil and divine foreknowledge. He tackles issues ranging from whether God's plan for salvation required evil acts, to how divine foreknowledge works when predicted events don't occur, to why Jewish and Christian traditions differ on evil as privation of good. Dr. Jacobs also examines whether ethical frameworks create false dilemmas, explores the concept of a malicious deity, and clarifies Eastern Orthodox views on body-soul unity.

All the links:

X: https://x.com/NathanJacobsPod

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0hSskUtCwDT40uFbqTk3QS

Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-nathan-jacobs-podcast

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thenathanjacobspodcast

Substack: https://nathanajacobs.substack.com/

Website: https://www.nathanajacobs.com/

Academia: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/NathanAJacobs

00:00:00 Intro

00:02:26 Question 1: Did God’s plan for Christ require evil/sin?

00:22:06 Question 2: How did God know Keilah would betray David if it never happened?

00:31:59 Question 3: Is the God vs. evil debate a false dilemma between deontology and utilitarianism?

00:53:57 Question 4: Does the story of Jesus healing the blind man demonstrate God as a utilitarian?

01:07:06 Question 5: If you would stop someone you loved from being hurt, why wouldn’t God?

01:23:22 Question 6: Natural disasters and the problem of evil (and why doesn’t God get rid of demons?)

01:33:37 Question 7: Do Jewish sources actually view evil as a privation of good?

01:38:58 Question 8: Why doesn't anyone argue that evil exists because of a malicious God?

01:44:02 Question 9: Are there evil archetypes?

01:49:28 Question 10: Is the Eastern Orthodox view of body-soul a hard dualism or psychosomatic holism?

Question 1:Human evil is a consequence of freedom, not divine planning. Yet the crucifixion required specific acts of evil: unjust torture and execution of Christ. How do you reconcile this? If God's plan needed these acts of injustice, doesn't this complicate the idea that evil is merely a byproduct of free choices?

Question 2:In 1 Samuel 23, God tells David that Keilah will deliver him to Saul. David leaves and isn't captured. If God knows the future because it happens, how does He know Keilah will betray David? Educated prediction based on knowing their hearts?

Question 3:You contrast human utilitarian decision-making with God's. But in the "baby Hitler" example, isn't the reasoning based on "don't kill innocent people"? Could this be another false dilemma?

Question 4:If God isn't utilitarian, how does Jesus say about a blind man that he wasn't blind because of sin but to show God's glory? Isn't that God choosing evil to make good?

Question 5:If you could stop your child from being *****, would you? If so, why wouldn't God?

Question 6:How might natural disasters fit into this discussion?

Question 7:You say "Jewish and Christian response" about evil's etiology, but Rabbinical tradition rejected evil as privation of good. Where do you see this in Jewish sources—that God allows evil for free agents but doesn't will it?

Question 8:Why haven't I heard the problem of evil handled by positing a malicious God? Why doesn't anyone argue evil exists because "God" is malicious and sadistic?

Question 9:Are there evil archetypes? If evil is distortion, every "evil archetype" is distortion too. Can archetypes as universal forces really be distorted?

Question 10:Dr. Jacobs speaks of strict body-soul dualism as separate parts. However, Eastern Orthodox position seems holistic—soul and body inseparable. Since the Fathers predated modernist splits, didn't they have a unified view of personhood?