The New War on the First Amendment

Keith Martin-Smith tackles America's free speech crisis in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination—examining how both left and right have abandoned principled commitments to the First Amendment in favor of tribal speech enforcement. The statistics are alarming: 34% of college students now believe violence can be justified to stop speech, while 70% think shouting down speakers is acceptable. Meanwhile, the right—once positioning itself as the defender of free speech—now threatens broadcast licenses (Jimmy Kimmel/ABC) and the Attorney General openly vows to prosecute "hate speech," which is constitutionally protected. Keith traces how we got here: the left's evolution from 20th-century free speech champions to 21st-century speech police, driven by sophisticated insights about power and identity that collapsed into "words are violence" when absorbed by pre-rational minds. The Biden administration's coordination with social media during COVID. Universities where 90% of faculty self-censor. A generation taught that disagreement equals danger. But the right offers no alternative. Trump's threats against critics, state laws punishing boycotts, banning books and classroom content — all wrapped in freedom rhetoric while furthering authoritarian control. The real issue isn't left versus right. It's developmental. Can we grow into people capable of holding the tension between freedom AND responsibility? Between protecting dissent AND attending to impact? Between defending speech we hate AND building cultures of care? The question isn't whose speech should we suppress. It's whether we can mature into people who can hear each other even when it hurts.