Lisa Miller, a domestic correspondent for The New York Times, discusses the historic verdict in which a parent was convicted for their child's mass shooting. The podcast explores the challenges of holding parents accountable, the ignorance of signs, and the complexities of determining parental responsibility. It also touches on the difficulties of making parents criminally responsible for their teenagers' actions and includes insights from Sue Klebold, the mother of one of the Columbine shooters.
This case marks the first time parents are being held criminally responsible for a child's mass shooting, raising questions about parental responsibility and the extent of their knowledge and role in preventing such acts.
The prosecution presents evidence of the parents' negligence and awareness of their son's alarming behavior, highlighting their knowledge of purchasing the gun, failure to address his mental state, disregard for concerning text messages and drawings, and lack of intervention after a meeting with the school guidance counselor.
Deep dives
The Case and the Unusual Charges
The historic case revolves around the shooting carried out by Ethan Crumbly, and the subsequent charges against his parents, James and Jennifer Crumbly. This marks the first time in the era of mass school shootings that parents are being held criminally responsible for their child's actions. The parents were charged with involuntary manslaughter, raising questions about parental responsibility for a child's criminal acts and the extent of a parent's knowledge and role in preventing such acts.
The Prosecution's Case and Evidence
The prosecution establishes the parents' negligence and their awareness of their son's alarming behavior leading up to the shooting. They emphasize the parents' knowledge of purchasing the gun and their failure to address their son's mental state. Through testimony and evidence, it is shown that the parents took their son to the gun range, ignored concerning text messages and drawings, and did not intervene after a meeting with the school guidance counselor about their son's disturbing behavior. The prosecution argues that an ordinary person in the same circumstances would have taken steps to prevent the tragedy.
The Defense and Counterarguments
The defense presents Jennifer Crumbly as a caring and involved parent who trusted her husband to handle matters related to guns. They argue that she was not responsible for her son's actions and that the prosecution is attempting to put blame on her as a way to satisfy the community's desire for accountability. They highlight the lack of foreseeability from Jennifer's perspective and question the validity of using isolated texts and images without proper context. The defense contends that holding parents criminally responsible for their child's actions sets a dangerous precedent and does not address the underlying issue of gun control.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode