FT News Briefing Swamp Notes: Conservatives have big plans for the judicial branch
11 snips
Jul 13, 2024 Barbara Perry, a professor of presidential studies at the University of Virginia, dives into the ramifications of Trump’s Supreme Court appointments. She discusses pivotal rulings on abortion rights and affirmative action, examining their long-term impacts ahead of the 2024 election. The conversation highlights the tension between the court's conservative decisions and public sentiment, particularly regarding presidential immunity. Perry also touches on how sports narratives, like those of the U.S. soccer teams, might intertwine with political aspirations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Conservative Legal Theory
- The Supreme Court's Chevron and immunity decisions appear contradictory, impacting executive power.
- The Chevron case aims to reduce regulations, while the immunity case expands presidential power, reflecting a nuanced conservative approach.
Future of the Conservative Legal Movement
- The conservative legal movement has achieved significant milestones like expanding gun rights and limiting regulatory agencies.
- Future priorities may involve further abortion-related cases, including those related to contraceptives and IVF.
Impact of Judicial Appointments
- The impact of appointing judges at all levels is evident in the abortion pill case involving Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk.
- This case highlights how lower court judges shape the legal landscape and influence Supreme Court decisions.