Strict Scrutiny Gender-Affirming Care in the Court’s Crosshairs
29 snips
Dec 2, 2024 The discussion dives into the contentious arena of judicial nominations and gender-affirming care for minors. Experts unpack recent Supreme Court decisions and their impact on societal norms. There are intriguing parallels drawn with historical cases like Loving v. Virginia. The conversation also touches on the FDA's denial of flavored e-cigarettes, blending humor with serious regulatory challenges. Lastly, hear alarming consequences of restrictive abortion laws and their effect on maternal health, emphasizing individual stories that highlight broader implications.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Jones vs. Vladek
- At the Federalist Society Convention, Judge Edith Jones read Steve Vladek's tweets from a manila folder.
- This act, reminiscent of reality TV, highlighted the right's victim mentality.
Victim Mentality
- Despite impending control of the federal government, the right maintains a strong victim mentality.
- This is evident in their attacks on adversaries like the media and academia.
Champagne Toast
- At the Federalist Society Convention, a champagne toast celebrated the administrative state's decline.
- Judges Naomi Rao and Catherine Meisel seemingly participated, raising ethical questions.