
The Lawfare Podcast
Lawfare Daily: Helen Toner and Zach Arnold on a Common Agenda for AI Doomers and AI Ethicists
Sep 13, 2024
Helen Toner, Director of Strategy at Georgetown's CSET, and Zach Arnold, Analytic Lead also at CSET, dive into the rift between AI ethicists and doomsayers. They highlight the pressing need for a unified approach to AI governance amid rising stakes. The duo discuss the potential for bipartisan cooperation in legislation and the critical role of third-party audits to ensure transparency. They also touch on personal data privacy challenges and the necessity for continuous dialogue on AI’s societal implications, exploring pathways for a safer technological future.
37:36
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The podcast emphasizes the need for AI regulation advocates to find common ground between 'doomers' and 'ethicists' to strengthen governance efforts.
- Investing in AI measurement science is crucial for establishing regulatory foundations that objectively evaluate AI models for bias and reliability.
Deep dives
The Divide in AI Regulation Advocacy
The podcast discusses the divergent camps in AI regulation advocacy, specifically the 'Ethicists' and 'Doomers.' Ethicists focus on addressing current harms associated with AI technologies, such as algorithmic bias and non-consensual deepfakes, striving to mitigate risks affecting marginalized groups. In contrast, the Doomers anticipate potential future threats posed by advanced AI, speculating on existential risks to humanity. Although both groups share concerns for AI oversight, their differing priorities lead to an often polarized discourse that complicates the pursuit of common regulatory solutions.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.