Opening Arguments

Rap on Trial - Young Thug Was Not the First and Won’t Be the Last

8 snips
Mar 31, 2025
Professor Jack Lerner, a clinical law professor at UC Irvine and expert in media law, joins to explore the legal landscape surrounding rap music. They discuss the troubling use of rap lyrics as courtroom evidence, particularly in Young Thug's trial, revealing biases that often misinterpret artists' words. Lerner emphasizes the need for reform to support artistic expression and considers how misrepresentations can unjustly impact lives. The conversation also touches on efforts to legislate against these practices in various states.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Tiny Doo Case

  • Tiny Doo, a rapper, was indicted in 2013 for gang membership solely based on his rap lyrics.
  • The indictment was later dismissed as there was no evidence of criminal activity beyond his artistic expression.
INSIGHT

Bias Against Rap Lyrics

  • Studies show that violent lyrics presented as rap are perceived as literal and reflective of the rapper's character.
  • The same lyrics from other genres are seen as artistic expression, highlighting a bias against rap music.
ADVICE

Authenticating Lyrics

  • Challenge the authenticity of rap lyrics presented as evidence.
  • Verify that the defendant wrote and performed the lyrics, as they could be quoting or reposting others' work.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app