Marietje Schaake, a former member of the European Parliament and current International Director of Policy at Stanford Cyber Policy Center, discusses the alarming impact of Big Tech on democracy. She argues that private tech companies are usurping power from democratic institutions. Highlighting concerns about cryptocurrency's destabilizing effects and rising authoritarianism, Schaake emphasizes the need for a 'public stack' to ensure community governance. Her insights provide a roadmap for safeguarding democracy in the digital age.
Marietje Schaake argues that unchecked tech companies significantly threaten democratic governance by usurping decision-making roles typically held by public institutions.
The rise of cryptocurrencies poses challenges to societal stability and democratic integrity, enabling wealth concentration that sidelines average citizens.
Implementing a 'public stack' approach is essential to ensure technology governance prioritizes community welfare over corporate interests, promoting transparency and accountability.
Deep dives
The Concept of the Tech Coup
The term 'tech coup' refers to the growing control that private tech companies have over decision-making processes traditionally held by public institutions. This power shift poses significant risks to democracy, as illustrated by instances where influential tech leaders, such as Elon Musk, have intervened in political affairs, impacting democratic governance. For example, Musk's influence has been linked to political threats regarding U.S. relations with Europe, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in the tech sector. The prevailing concern is that without adequate regulation and safeguards, democracies may continue to be undermined by these corporate interests.
Systemic Challenges in Technology and Democracy
The increasing complexity of technological infrastructure, including undersea cables and data centers, highlights the systemic issues stemming from unchecked tech companies. Former policymakers emphasize the need for a broader perspective that examines how tech impacts democratic governance rather than merely addressing isolated incidents of disinformation or cyber breaches. The rise of technologies that complicate war and conflict decisions, traditionally the domain of sovereign states, exemplifies this challenge. For instance, developments like satellite internet connectivity during wartime have blurred the lines between corporate power and national security.
The Struggles of Democratic Resilience
Democratic nations are facing a crisis of resilience as authoritarian forces gain momentum globally. The decline of democratic institutions over the past two decades has made it more difficult for these governments to combat such forces effectively. As seen in the U.S., the shifting political landscape poses new challenges to coalition-building among democracies. Proposals from American leaders that undermine international alliances, like NATO, further exacerbate concerns about global democratic cohesion and stability.
Cryptocurrencies and Financial Power Dynamics
The discussion around cryptocurrency emphasizes its role in destabilizing societies and potentially undermining democracies. Cryptocurrencies operate outside traditional regulatory frameworks, allowing significant capital to accumulate in the hands of a few, while average citizens risk financial loss from speculative investments. The growing influence of crypto enthusiasts in politics raises alarms about their intentions and the possible erosion of democratic institutions. Critics argue that as these assets gain value, they may disrupt socio-economic structures and concentrate controlling power, leaving traditional financial systems vulnerable.
The Need for a Public Stack
The concept of a 'public stack' suggests that technology governance should prioritize transparency, accountability, and community impact over shareholder interests. Current tech monopolies, by consolidating resources, pose security risks that threaten societal well-being and democratic processes. This approach advocates for a shift towards using government purchasing power to support alternatives, ensuring that technology serves public interests collectively rather than corporate profit alone. The introduction of public values into tech governance aims to restore the balance of power, promote innovation that benefits society, and mitigate disparities.
Big tech companies are playing an outsized role in our world and are increasingly involved in creating policy that has negative impacts on democracies. In her book The Tech Coup, Marietje Schaake argues that companies need to be reined in, and that democracies need to organize themselves in ways that can withstand the challenges posed by these companies and their increasingly imperious owners.
Marietje joins Dave for a spirited post-election conversation about how the Tech Coup is playing out right now, and what we can do about it.
MarietjeSchaake (X, Bluesky, Mastodon)
"The Tech Coup: How to Save Democracy from Silicon Valley"
Tech Coup, Democracy, Elon Musk, Regulation, Cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Global Governance, Public Stack, Resilience, Alternative Platforms, Geopolitics, Cybersecurity, Social Inequality, Ukraine War, Authoritarianism, Disinformation, Digital Infrastructure, Data Centers, Procurement, Investments, AI, Cables, Data Centers
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode