Shaylene Nancekivell and Xin Sun discuss their research on the negative consequences of the learning styles myth. They explore topics such as the lack of evidence for tailoring instruction to learning styles, the impact of labeling students with learning styles on academic choices, and the harmful effects of these beliefs on students' opportunities and identities.
Tailoring instruction to students' specific learning styles does not result in improved learning outcomes.
Belief in learning styles can lead to biased perceptions and expectations, limiting students' opportunities.
Deep dives
The persistent belief in learning styles and its consequences
The podcast episode discusses the persistent belief that students learn better when instruction is tailored to their specific learning style. However, research has shown that this belief, known as the learning style myth, lacks empirical evidence. The episode emphasizes that while there are numerous versions of the learning style myth, they often revolve around the idea that matching instructional methods to an individual's supposed learning style will enhance learning outcomes. Despite efforts to disprove this myth, studies have consistently found no significant effects on learning. The episode highlights that the learning style myth can have negative consequences, such as creating biases and limiting perceptions of students' academic potential.
The effect of learning styles on perceptions of academic potential
The podcast episode presents several studies examining the impact of identifying students' learning styles on perceptions of academic potential. The studies involved parents, teachers, and children, with participants rating and comparing the perceived intelligence and academic performance of visual learners versus hands-on learners. The results revealed a consistent bias, as both parents and teachers rated visual learners as smarter and predicted higher grades for them in various subjects. This indicates that a belief in learning styles can lead to biased perceptions and expectations, potentially shaping educational decisions and limiting students' opportunities.
The persistence of the learning style myth
The episode discusses the persistence of the learning style myth despite the lack of evidence supporting it. The hosts highlight that learning styles continue to be taught in teacher education programs, and many educators still incorporate learning style concepts into their teaching practices. The podcast also mentions that neuromyth surveys have found learning styles to be one of the most widely held and perpetuated myths in education. The episode emphasizes the importance of challenging these beliefs and providing educators with evidence-based practices and alternatives to support student learning.
Future directions and implications
The podcast episode explores future directions for research on learning styles and discusses potential implications for students, educators, and guidance counselors. The hosts highlight the need for further investigation into how labeling students with learning styles can affect the advice given to them about potential career paths and program recommendations. They also emphasize the importance of considering the impact of learning styles on students' self-perception and decision-making. Additionally, the episode raises questions about how learning styles intersect with other aspects of students' identities and the need to examine the effects of learning styles on decision-making at the institutional level. Overall, the episode emphasizes the importance of debunking the learning style myth and promoting evidence-based practices in education.
One of the most persistent neuromyths is the belief that students learn more when instruction is tailored to their specific learning style. In this episode, Shaylene Nancekivell and Xin Sun join us to discuss their research on possible negative consequences of the learning styles myth.
Shaylene is an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Manitoba. Xin is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Psychology at the University of British Columbia. Shaylene and Xin are co-authors of a study entitled “Beware the myth: learning styles affect parents', children's, and teachers' thinking about children's academic potential,” published in the NPJ Science of Learning journal this fall.