Rachel Barkow, a NYU criminal law professor and CAFE contributor, unpacks the Supreme Court's role in mass incarceration in this insightful discussion. She addresses how historical decisions have paved the way for current injustices in the criminal justice system. Barkow critiques pretrial detention laws that undermine the presumption of innocence and examines the impact of political pressures on judicial decisions. She also discusses the Trump administration’s controversial criminal justice policies, highlighting the need for reform and accountability.
The Supreme Court's failure to uphold constitutional protections has significantly contributed to the mass incarceration crisis in America.
Political shifts influenced by crises and social justice movements have impacted perceptions and responses to mass incarceration over time.
Deep dives
The Role of the Supreme Court in Mass Incarceration
The Supreme Court has played a significant role in the rise of mass incarceration in the United States, although it is not the primary driver of this issue. The political branches, primarily legislators and prosecutors, are often blamed for implementing tougher laws and sentencing guidelines. However, the Court has enabled mass incarceration by allowing status quo practices to persist rather than upholding constitutional protections. This failure to act against government overreach has contributed to the escalation of incarceration rates, which disproportionately affect marginalized communities.
America's Distinct Incarceration Rates
The United States stands as the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world, accounting for nearly a quarter of the global prison population despite only comprising about 5% of the world's overall population. This phenomenon is relatively new, with significant increases in incarceration beginning in the 1970s, diverging sharply from trends observed in other Western democracies. The drastic rise in incarceration has transformed criminal justice into a complex issue that intertwines with race, politics, and social policies. Understanding the historical context helps highlight how current practices and societal attitudes differ from those of previous generations.
Political Shifts and Public Perceptions
Political perceptions regarding criminal justice and mass incarceration have shifted over time, particularly influenced by financial crises and social justice movements. Following the financial crisis of 2008, certain state legislatures started reconsidering expensive incarceration practices due to budgetary constraints. The George Floyd protests in 2020 spurred increased awareness of racial injustice and led to a somewhat progressive shift toward addressing mass incarceration. Despite these movements, there remains a lack of coherent policies from both parties, often resulting in returns to punitive measures in response to crime.
Legal Precedents and Pretrial Detention
Legal precedents play a critical role in the current state of pretrial detention, with decisions that have led to routine detentions based solely on perceived danger rather than due process. The landmark case of United States v. Salerno established a precedent allowing pretrial detention for those deemed dangerous, shifting the legal landscape significantly since it was decided. This case underpins the rationale for keeping many individuals incarcerated before their trial, affecting disproportionately those charged with non-violent offenses. The broader implications of such decisions underscore the need for reflection on the foundational principles of justice and the treatment of defendants in the criminal system.
Did the Supreme Court lay the legal foundation for mass incarceration? CAFE Contributor & NYU criminal law professor Rachel Barkow joins Preet to discuss this very question which she explores in her new book, Justice Abandoned: How the Supreme Court Ignored the Constitution and Enabled Mass Incarceration.
You can now watch portions of our episodes on YouTube! Head to CAFE’s Youtube channel and subscribe.
Stay Tuned in Brief is presented by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Please write to us with your thoughts and questions at letters@cafe.com, or leave a voicemail at 669-247-7338.
For analysis of recent legal news, join the CAFE Insider community. Head to cafe.com/insider to join for just $1 for the first month.