Tim Shanahan, Distinguished Professor Emeritus and a renowned literacy expert, delves into his book, 'Leveled Reading, Leveled Lives.' He challenges the effectiveness of leveled reading, arguing it often holds students back rather than helping them. Shanahan advocates for explicit instruction and practical strategies teachers can implement to enhance reading outcomes. He highlights the importance of tackling complex sentence structures for better comprehension and stresses the need for a comprehensive approach to literacy that addresses diverse student needs.
43:10
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Misuse of Instructional Level Theory
The idea of matching children with instructional level texts is based on outdated and misused theories from psychology.
Vygotsky's zone of proximal development theory, often cited, actually supports teaching challenging texts with support rather than easing difficulty.
insights INSIGHT
Leveled Reading Holds Students Back
Research consistently shows teaching at instructional levels does not improve, and may impede, reading progress.
Precise measurement of text difficulty and student ability is difficult, and reducing instruction time for small leveled groups weakens learning.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Shanahan's Personal Teaching Reflection
Tim Shanahan shares that he himself practiced leveled reading with his students early in his career.
He realizes now that despite good intentions, this approach was part of the problem.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
In this episode of Science of Reading: The Podcast, top literacy scholar Tim Shanahan, Ph.D., returns to discuss his new book, Leveled Reading, Leveled Lives: How Students’ Reading Achievement Has Been Held Back and What We Can Do About It. During his conversation with Susan Lambert, he outlines what existing research says about leveled reading—and why it’s not effective. He also shares how the misuse of theory can lead to ineffectual conclusions, makes a case for the efficacy of more explicit instruction, and provides a few simple tweaks teachers can make to classroom instruction that can make a big difference for their students.
Show notes:
Access free, high-quality resources at our brand new companion professional learning page.
“This notion of trying to match kids to books and get everybody to their right level is, at the very least, wasteful. It's not benefiting kids.” —Tim Shanahan, Ph.D.
“We're spending an awful lot of time doing a lot of work that is not only not paying off, but it's probably holding a lot of kids back.” —Tim Shanahan, Ph.D.
“Maybe we should be having kids read some of these texts more than once. Maybe we should be doing some of our fluency work, not after we did the comprehension work, but ahead of time.” —Tim Shanahan, Ph.D.
Episode timestamps* 02:00 Introduction: Who is Tim Shanahan? 03:00 Most proud of as a researcher 05:00 Most proud of in education policy work 06:00 First book: Leveled Reading, Leveled Lives 07:00 Motivation to write: Addressing instructional levels 14:00 Relevance of misuse of theory 17:00 Leveled instruction isn’t effective 21:00 Self-reflections in the writing process 22:00 Parallels to verbal learning 24:00 What can teachers do? 26:00 Fluency and reading things twice 32:00 Grade level teaching opens opportunities 33:00 The future of literacy development 39:00 What is happening in American schools? *Timestamps are approximate, rounded to nearest minute