Burnett v. NAR: The Lawsuit That Could Upend the Housing Market
Oct 18, 2023
auto_awesome
A high-stakes trial in the real estate industry called Burnett v. NAR is discussed. The potential disruption for home sales, the application of the 'per se' standard, and the challenges faced by the Burnett are explored. The pivotal role of the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) is also analyzed.
The outcome of the Burnett v. NAR trial could have significant implications for the future of the housing market and consumer experience.
The court may rule per se if an agreement to fix prices is found among defendants, but NAR can still argue that sellers, not buyers, pay the commission.
The trial's outcome is uncertain, and the emotional impact on the jury will play a crucial role in determining the verdict.
Deep dives
The possibility of settlements by KW and Home Services
There is a likelihood of settlements by Keller Williams and Home Services, given the generous settlement made by RE/MAX and the expected outcome of the trial.
The nature of the trial
The trial is scheduled for three weeks, with the plaintiffs presenting their case first, followed by cross-examination by NAR. The jury selection process has already begun, with specific exclusions such as homeowners and realtors.
Per se ruling and potential outcomes
There is a possibility of a per se ruling if the court finds an agreement to fix prices among defendants. However, even with such a ruling, NAR still has a chance of winning by arguing that sellers, not buyers, pay the commission, and that the defendants are not involved in a price-fixing scheme. The trial's outcome is uncertain, and a lot depends on the emotional impact on the jury.
Implications for NAR and the real estate industry
If NAR wins the case, it may boost confidence in the organization, but it will not necessarily resolve other pending issues or ongoing investigations. The DOJ and FTC still have the power to implement their own regulations and rules for the industry, which could have further implications on agent compensation.
The appeal bond and potential bankruptcy
If NAR loses the case and decides to appeal, they would have to post an appeal bond that balances the interests of both the plaintiffs and the defendants. The bond amount would consider the plaintiffs' ability to collect damages and the defendants' ability to pay while avoiding bankruptcy. The bond may not be the full value of the damages claimed by the plaintiffs, but it serves as a form of insurance for plaintiffs in case they win future appeals.
What if we told you that a high-stakes trial in the real estate and technology industry is about to unfold, with potential implications for consumers and the future of the housing market? Today, Rob and Greg are joined by Ed Zorn, Vice President and General Counsel at CRMLS, and they dive into the details of the ongoing Burnett v. NAR trial, exploring the various legal aspects and arguments that could lead to a major disruption for home sales.
Join us as we discuss the application of the "per se" standard, the challenges faced by the Burnett, and the pivotal role of the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) in this episode of our podcast. Don’t miss this heated discussion as Rob and Greg once again do their best to save the real estate industry.
Listen to the Industry Relations Podcast, available on all podcast platforms!