Adam Laats, a Professor of Education and History at SUNY Binghamton, dives into the complex world of the U.S. Department of Education. He examines its creation and evolution, illuminating misconceptions about its role in school curricula. Laats discusses the political battles surrounding the department, including past efforts to dismantle it, and highlights pivotal moments like the 'A Nation at Risk' report. The conversation emphasizes ongoing debates about federal influence and future challenges within the education system.
The U.S. Department of Education primarily supports existing educational programs instead of directly managing K-12 schools or curricula.
Political promises to dismantle the Department reflect concerns over federal influence in education but ignore its significant funding and civil rights roles.
Deep dives
Understanding the Department of Education's Role
The U.S. Department of Education does not directly manage the curricula or operations of K-12 schools or colleges, contrary to widespread belief. Its primary role is to support and coordinate existing educational programs rather than dictate educational policy. Created during the Carter administration, the department was established to symbolize a federal commitment to education, although much of the control lies at the state and local levels. Its influence manifests through funding initiatives like Title I, which provides financial support to schools serving low-income students, and through enforcement of federal educational laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Political Controversies Surrounding the Department
The Department of Education has been a focal point of political controversy, often viewed as an elite bureaucracy that interferes with local schooling. Public perception has consistently shown a dissatisfaction with overall American education while simultaneously expressing satisfaction with local schools, creating a contradiction in opinions. Statements from political figures, including promises to dismantle the department, stem from concerns over federal influences steering educational content and policies. The department's actions, however, including financial assistance and civil rights protections, often enjoy broad support even among those dissatisfied with its existence.
Historical Context Behind the Department's Creation
The current Department of Education was established in 1979, following a series of political maneuvers that included the elimination of significant opposition following the murder of Congressman Leo Ryan in Jonestown, which diminished resistance to educational reforms. Its inception marked a departure from an earlier, short-lived department established post-Civil War, which was unpopular and ineffective. The political dynamics surrounding its creation involved alliances with educational advocacy groups and showcased the complex interplay of local and federal education policies. Despite early challenges, the department gained traction as a platform for educational priorities, catalyzed by its connections to larger social and political movements within the country.
During his campaign, Donald Trump promised several times that he would dismantle the US Department of Education. So today we wanted to explore what such a dismantling would look like, as well as what the DoED does in the first place.
Turns out, while the Department does an awful lot of things, there is much for which it is criticized that it does not do. Taking us through its creation, its history, and its powers is Adam Laats, professor of Education at Binghamton University.
Link to our episodes on School Lunch here and here.
And here are some good resources for anyone who wants to know a little more about Jonestown. My 8th grade report is, sadly, unavailable.