David Graham, a staff writer at the Atlantic, and George Conway, a conservative lawyer known for his wit against Trump, delve into the escalating use of mockery in politics. They discuss how Democrats have embraced mocking Trump—a tactic he’s used against opponents for years. The conversation highlights the risks and benefits of humor in political discourse, exploring its potential to shape public perception. They also unpack the psychological effects of Trump’s narcissism and the power of targeted campaign ads to expose vulnerabilities.
Democrats are shifting their political discourse from high-minded rhetoric to employing mockery as a strategic tool against Trump.
While mockery can effectively undermine Trump's authority, it also risks trivializing serious democratic threats, necessitating careful balance in political engagement.
Deep dives
The Shift in Political Strategy
A notable shift in the Democratic Party's approach to political discourse has emerged, moving from Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' mantra to a strategy that openly embraces mockery. This change can be attributed to Democrats becoming increasingly disillusioned with the effectiveness of high-minded rhetoric, particularly following their setbacks in recent elections. Instead, politicians like Tim Walz have embraced casual language, such as using the word 'weird' to describe political opponents, signaling a shift in how Democrats are willing to engage with rivals. This evolution reflects a broader acceptance of an aggressive stance, suggesting that humor and ridicule could resonate more with voters fed up with conventional political decorum.
The Role of Mockery in Undermining Authority
Mockery has surfaced as a strategic tool to undermine the perceived authority of leaders like Donald Trump, as evidenced by the insights shared by both Atlantic staff and conservative commentator George Conway. The use of humor to deflate a leader's ego can be a powerful weapon, as mockery is shown to provoke emotional responses that can destabilize opponents. Conway's experience in targeting Trump with tailored advertisements illustrates how effective ridicule can be in highlighting Trump’s vulnerabilities. Furthermore, this approach is underscored by the understanding that diminishing a leader’s persona can resonate with undecided voters who may question their previous support.
The Risks and Rewards of This Approach
While embracing a mockery-based political strategy presents new avenues for engagement, it also carries inherent risks that could threaten the seriousness of democratic discourse. Detractors warn that using ridicule may diminish the gravity of the very real threats to democracy posed by figures like Trump, potentially leading to a perception of trivialization. Historical examples indicate that attempts to mock Trump in past campaigns often fell flat, highlighting the fine line between effective criticism and reductive humor. As Democrats navigate this newfound willingness to attack Trump directly, they must balance humor with a clear assertion of the stakes involved in the upcoming elections.
Democrats are lately employing a strategy against Donald Trump that he has been using effectively against his opponents for years: mockery. Where did this strategy come from? Will it remain effective? And can it backfire?
We talk with the Atlantic staff writer David Graham, who was at the Democratic convention and also covers Trump. And we talk with a surprising muse for the politics of mockery: Conservative lawyer and activist George Conway has been using targeted mockery against Trump for years, with unusual success.
Get more from your favorite Atlantic voices when you subscribe. You’ll enjoy unlimited access to Pulitzer-winning journalism, from clear-eyed analysis and insight on breaking news to fascinating explorations of our world. Subscribe today at TheAtlantic.com/podsub.
