

Judicial Authority for Me Not Thee
7 snips Jul 1, 2025
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on nationwide injunctions is unpacked, affecting future executive action challenges. The hosts delve into a DHS lawsuit against federal judges and the Justice Department's push to denaturalize citizens. They discuss ICE's tactics, particularly targeting migrant workers through routine stops, raising concerns over legal limits and racial bias. Additionally, the intricate issues surrounding birthright citizenship and judicial authority in immigration cases reveal the complexities within the legal system, demonstrating the balance between law and policy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Limits on Universal Injunctions
- The Supreme Court limits "universal injunctions" to cover only plaintiffs before the court.
- They rule injunctions must be no broader than necessary to fully relieve each plaintiff.
Supreme Court's Injunction Dichotomy
- The Supreme Court maintains a paradox by restricting lower courts while allowing themselves broader powers.
- Justice Barrett distinguishes the Supreme Court's power as interim relief to justify this difference.
Utilize Class Actions for Relief
- Use class actions to secure nationwide relief when universal injunctions are restricted.
- Ensure class certification requirements like common legal issues and typicality are met to sustain the class.