Undisclosed Financial Conflicts of Interest in the DSM-5: An interview with Lisa Cosgrove and Brian Piper
Mar 20, 2024
auto_awesome
Lisa Cosgrove and Brian Piper discuss undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in the DSM-5, exploring the impact on psychiatric diagnoses and treatment guidelines. They highlight the prevalence of conflicts among key opinion leaders in psychiatry and the implications for patient care. The conversation also touches on industry funding in medication-induced movement disorders, the medicalization of emotional distress, and the importance of transparency and skepticism in mental health research.
Undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in the DSM-5 can impact psychiatric diagnostic tools, highlighting the need for transparency and unbiased medical guidance.
Conflicts of interest in medicine can lead to biased information, emphasizing the importance of regulating industry influence for ethical psychiatric practices.
Deep dives
Research Findings on Conflicts of Interest in Diagnostic Tools
Examining conflicts of interest, new research from the British Medical Journal explores their impact on diagnostic tools like the DSM. Authors Lisa Cosgrove and Brian Piper investigated undisclosed financial conflicts of interest within the DSM-5-TR. The study highlights the potential influence of conflicts of interest on psychiatric diagnostic and treatment guidelines, emphasizing the need to address these issues for unbiased medical guidance.
Implications of Conflicts of Interest in Medicine
Conflicts of interest in medicine can lead to implicit bias, affecting the objectivity of information provided to healthcare practitioners. The discussion delves into historical examples, such as Sigmund Freud's promotion of cocaine, to illustrate how financial interests can impact medical care. The study underscores the importance of transparency and regulation to mitigate industry influence on psychiatric diagnoses and treatment recommendations.
Call for Enhanced Conflict of Interest Management
The study reveals substantial undisclosed financial interests among contributors to the DSM, amounting to $14 million. The authors advocate for improved conflict of interest management beyond mere disclosure. Suggestions include involving experts without conflicts of interest in guideline development and increasing diversity in decision-making panels to ensure balanced and ethical diagnostic practices in psychiatry. The need for robust regulation and transparency in medical research and practice is emphasized for fostering trust and integrity.
On the MIA podcast this week we turn our attention to conflicts of interest (COIs) and new research from the British Medical Journal (BMJ). Mad in America has previously examined the problems with conflicts of interest in research but this time we extend that to look at the potential effect of COIs on diagnostic tools such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).
Thank you for being with us to listen to the podcast and read our articles this year. MIA is funded entirely by reader donations. If you value MIA, please help us continue to survive and grow.
To find the Mad in America podcast on your preferred podcast player, click here
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode