The Commentary Magazine Podcast Kingdom Comey
12 snips
Sep 26, 2025 Dive into the fallout from James Comey's indictment and its implications for law and politics. The hosts dissect the confusion over the case's strength and explore concerns over prosecutorial tactics. They reflect on Comey's controversial past, his peculiar public persona, and how partisan responses shape accountability. From fears of weaponization of legal processes to the ongoing impact of Russiagate, the conversation raises vital questions about political norms and the erosion of institutional trust. Tune in for an insightful analysis!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Legal Merit Vs. Political Optics
- The Comey indictment splits opinion because legal merit and political optics diverge sharply.
- John Podhoretz highlights that legal experts call the case weak while political reaction treats it as existential.
Comey's 2016 Statements Helped Trump
- John recounts how Comey's July 2016 statement benefited Donald Trump in the election.
- He says Comey's public comments and reopening of the email probe materially aided Trump's victory.
Lying-On-Forms Is A Frequent Charge
- The hosts note 18 U.S.C. §1018-style charges can be the easiest route to indictments.
- Podhoretz argues lying-on-forms statutes make flimsy indictments common and politically charged.