Constitutional law scholar discusses gaps in Supreme Court's ethics code. Partner at Paul Weiss talks about civil case over violence at Charlottesville rally and danger signs in recent protests.
The Supreme Court's new code of ethics lacks enforcement mechanisms and fails to hold justices to the same standards as lower court judges, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and recusal.
White supremacist and neo-Nazi groups are exploiting divisions caused by recent events and using anti-Semitism to mobilize their movements, highlighting the need for increased awareness and action to combat their influence and prevent future violence.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Ethics Code: More Guidelines Than Rules
The Supreme Court has introduced a code of conduct in response to ethics controversies, but the code is seen as more of a PR move than a significant change. Constitutional law scholar David Super explains that the code lacks enforcement mechanisms and does not hold the justices to the same standards as lower court judges. There are concerns about conflicts of interest, gifts, and recusal, with the code being vague and less stringent than the rules for lower court judges. Overall, the ethics code is seen as toothless and unlikely to lead to substantial changes in the behavior of the justices.
Transparency and Lack Thereof in the Supreme Court
The introduction of the code of conduct does little to improve the transparency of the Supreme Court. There is no mechanism to investigate or enforce the rules, and violations may go unnoticed unless exposed by external sources. This lack of transparency further erodes public confidence in the court. Without proper enforcement and oversight, the court's ethics standards remain at the lowest common denominator.
Impact of the Charlottesville Lawsuit and Awareness of White Supremacist Groups
Karen Dunn, a lawyer involved in the successful Charlottesville lawsuit, discusses the impact of the case on deterring white supremacist violence. While the lawsuit did not eradicate the movements, it acted as a deterrent and raised awareness about the coordinated and tactical nature of these groups. Dunn also notes the exploitation of divisions following recent events in the Middle East, where white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups are infiltrating pro-Palestinian rallies. She highlights the historical and tactical use of anti-Semitism by these groups and emphasizes the need for increased awareness to combat the spread of hate and violence.
White Supremacist Groups Exploiting Divisions and the Rise of Anti-Semitism
White supremacist and neo-Nazi groups are capitalizing on the divisions caused by recent events to further their agenda. Karen Dunn notes that these groups are attending rallies and celebrating actions that align with their ideologies. She emphasizes the tactic of using anti-Semitism to mobilize their movements, highlighting the significant increase in anti-Semitic incidents in the United States. The rise in anti-Semitism poses a threat to society as a whole and requires broader awareness and action to curb its influence and prevent future violence.
Constitutional law scholar David Super, a professor at Georgetown Law, discusses the gaps in the Supreme Court’s new code of ethics. Karen Dunn, a partner at Paul Weiss, discusses her civil case over the violence at the 2017 Charlottesville Unite the Right rally and danger signs seen in recent protests. June Grasso hosts.