The Body of Evidence
Interview - Paul Ingraham on Quitting Massage Therapy
Apr 24, 2022
Paul Ingraham shares his journey from woo believer to skeptic in massage therapy. Topics include tone policing, evidence-based vs science-based medicine, and navigating snark in healthcare. The discussion delves into Bayesian statistics, professionalism in healthcare, and the challenges of evidence-based medicine. A fascinating look at the evolution of skepticism and the importance of critical thinking in healthcare.
01:02:51
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Regulators should prioritize factual accuracy over tone policing when evaluating healthcare providers' content.
- Transitioning from a massage therapist to a critical thinker involves embracing skepticism and evidence-based approaches.
Deep dives
Regulation in Healthcare: Tone Policing vs. Factual Accuracy
In navigating the challenges of assessing professionalism in a modern context where healthcare providers engage in public discourse through blogs and podcasts, a crucial distinction arises between tone policing and ensuring factual accuracy. Paul Ingram's experience highlights the pitfalls of focusing on tone over substance, as regulators need to prioritize whether information provided is factually correct rather than subjective qualities like tone. With a post-pandemic lens sharpening awareness of the impact of misinformation, the call to regulators is to steer away from subjectivity and hone in on detecting grossly inaccurate information disseminated by healthcare professionals.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
