Can We Still Trust U.S. Economic Data?

Aug 4, 2025

Join Ben Casselman, Chief Economics Correspondent at The New York Times, and Tara Sinclair, Chair of the Economics Department at George Washington University, as they dissect the alarming revisions in U.S. job statistics. They delve into potential political interference at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, exploring how trust in economic data shapes growth and decision-making. The conversation also highlights the dangers of data manipulation, drawing parallels with economic crises in Argentina and Greece, and underscores the need for integrity in federal statistics.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Political Pressure Threatens Data Integrity

The firing of the BLS commissioner raises serious concerns about political pressure on U.S. economic data.
Career civil servants and established methodologies provide some reassurance against immediate manipulation.

INSIGHT

Increased Skepticism Towards Data Needed

There was no prior evidence of political meddling in economic data despite longstanding concerns about funding.
Now, given recent events, skepticism about data accuracy is more warranted than before.

ANECDOTE

Civil Servants Resist Political Pressure

William Wiatrowski, the acting BLS director, expressed that civil servants would quit if pressured to compromise data quality.
His presence currently offers hope for maintaining integrity despite political changes.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

On Friday morning the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its jobs numbers for July. The nation provisionally added 73,000 jobs, shy of the 100,000 jobs expected. It wasn’t particularly good news.

More newsworthy, though, were the downward revisions for May and June. What had initially been reported as just shy of 150,000 jobs added each month, turned out to be closer to just 15,000 jobs per month. Quite plainly bad news.

The Trump administration first went to work spinning the numbers as the result of seasonal adjustments. By the afternoon, President Trump claimed on social media that the numbers were manipulated for political reasons and said that he’d directed his team to fire the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer.

I probably don’t need to tell you, dear listener, that this raises red flags. If you listen to this podcast, it’s probably because – in addition to finding me charming (lol) – you value what data can tell us about the world as it is, not the world as we might wish it to be.

For now, the acting director of the BLS is William Wiatrowski, the former deputy director. But the administration has said they’ll replace him within a matter of days and the question now is whether that new person might apply pressure within the bureau to make economic data look more like the president wishes it to be.

That’s what we discuss on today’s podcast and we’ve got an all star lineup to do it. Joining me is economics department chair at George Washington University Tara Sinclair. She’s been a visiting scholar at the St. Louis and Atlanta Fed banks, a technical advisor at the Bureau of Labor statistics, and founding chief economist at the job search site Indeed. Also with us is Ben Casselman, the chief economics correspondent at the New York Times, who worked with me at FiveThirtyEight back in the day.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.gdpolitics.com/subscribe