Lee Zeldin, former President Trump’s appointee at the EPA, discusses his controversial rollbacks of environmental regulations. He explains the elimination of 31 key protections aimed at climate change and pollution, sparking debates on economic versus ecological priorities. The conversation also traces the historical shift in environmental policy, contrasting today's political battleground with the late 1960s, when the environment united bipartisan efforts. Zeldin highlights the evolving public perception of the EPA and its challenges in safeguarding ecological interests.
The rollback of 31 environmental regulations by EPA administrator Lee Zeldin represents a significant shift towards deregulatory policies that prioritize economic concerns over climate action.
Historically, the establishment of the EPA in the 1970s was a bipartisan response to public pressure for environmental protection, contrasting sharply with today's polarized political landscape.
Deep dives
EPA's Deregulatory Actions and Political Implications
The podcast discusses the recent actions taken by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under its current administrator, Lee Zeldin, who has announced a significant rollback of regulations aimed at combating climate change and pollution. This deregulatory initiative is being touted as the most consequential in U.S. history, as it eliminates 31 environmental rules that impact various sectors, including electric vehicles and power plants. Zeldin's statement suggests that these changes are intended to alleviate living costs for American families and revitalize the job market, contrasting sharply with historical environmental movements. The shift raises concerns about the intersection of environmental policy with political strategy, particularly as climate issues are seen as pivotal electoral topics.
Historical Context of Environmental Regulation
The evolution of environmental protection in the U.S. is traced back to significant pollution incidents during the late 1960s, which sparked public outcry and led to the establishment of the EPA by Richard Nixon. Events like the Santa Barbara oil spill and the notorious Cuyahoga River fire were wake-up calls that galvanized citizens and compelled policymakers to address environmental concerns. Nixon recognized the popularity of the environmental movement amidst turmoil from civil rights and anti-war protests, positioning the environment as a unifying cause. These historical moments set the stage for the EPA's creation and its initial mission to enforce regulations that protect public health and the environment.
Impact of Political Polarization on Environmental Action
The podcast highlights how political polarization has transformed environmental policy into a contentious partisan issue over the decades. Initially, environmental concerns garnered bipartisan support, but over time, the Republican Party shifted towards anti-regulation ideologies, exacerbated by figures like Ronald Reagan who sought to dismantle existing frameworks. The conversation also points out that the evolving landscape has left the EPA vulnerable, with reduced public trust and support, as legislators often prioritize economic concerns over environmental action. Unless there is a significant public movement advocating for strict environmental protections, the effectiveness of the EPA and the integrity of environmental regulations are likely to continue deteriorating.
President Trump's appointee at the Environmental Protection Agency, Lee Zeldin, is making a lot of changes at the EPA. Including cutting 31 environmental rules regarding climate change pollution, electric vehicles, and power plants. Environmentalists say this is a gutting of regulation.
GOP lawmakers deem the EPA a job killer that does nothing but burden businesses with regulations. In the eyes of the American public, the environment ranks low on the list of priorities the government should address.
But flash back to the late 1960s, and it's a very different story. The environment was a bipartisan issue, and a Republican president created the EPA in 1970 in response to public pressure. So how did we get here? How did the environment go from universal concern to political battleground — with the EPA caught in the crossfire?
In a piece we first aired in 2017, Brooke considered the tumultuous history of the EPA, its evolving relationship with the public, and its uncertain future.
On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
