When Transit isn't Built to be Transit (with RMTransit)
Jan 24, 2025
auto_awesome
This discussion focuses on the rise of streetcar systems in the U.S., beginning with Portland's success and its impact on urban revitalization. It critiques the superficial implementation of transit-oriented development and the ironic preference for parking structures over public transport. The conversation highlights urban transit challenges in cities like Edmonton, emphasizing the need for cohesive planning. Additionally, it contrasts the hidden costs of rail versus road projects, advocating for prioritizing quality transit solutions for livable cities.
47:43
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Portland's successful streetcar system inspired other US cities, yet many failed to address local transit needs adequately.
Streetcar initiatives often prioritized property development over genuine transit solutions, resulting in low ridership and sustainability concerns.
Future streetcar success relies on strategic integration within broader transit systems and urban policies that enhance commuting effectiveness.
Deep dives
Development Driven by Streetcar Projects
The Obama-era streetcars in the U.S. emerged as a significant urban policy initiative aimed at fostering transit-oriented development (TOD). Cities built these streetcar systems not merely for the sake of enhancing public transit, but primarily to stimulate new real estate development and economic activity in former industrial areas. The projects were often seen more as a means to increase property values and tax revenue rather than improve transit accessibility. For instance, developments along streetcar corridors, like in Washington D.C.'s H Street, saw significant gentrification, illustrating how these initiatives could drive urban renewal.
Lessons from Portland's Success
Portland's initial success with its streetcar system set the stage for similar projects across various U.S. cities. The Portland streetcars, which integrated transit with urban redevelopment, effectively attracted investment and transformed surrounding neighborhoods. Other cities viewed Portland's achievements as a blueprint, prompting them to initiate their own projects often without fully evaluating the context-specific needs of their areas. As a result, while Portland saw substantial growth, many other cities faced challenges when replicating this model due to a lack of coherent planning.
Challenges of Transit Efficacy
Despite some successes, many streetcar systems have struggled to provide effective transit solutions. A common issue is that these systems often operate in mixed traffic at limited lengths, making them less practical for daily commuting when alternatives like walking or biking are just as viable. Ridership numbers in many cities have been low compared to other transit modes, often leading to questions about their overall public transit effectiveness. This has raised concerns about their sustainability, given their dependence on continuous ridership for funding and maintenance.
Urbanism's Aesthetic vs. Functional Needs
The implementation of these streetcar projects sometimes reflects a trend referred to as 'aesthetic urbanism,' where the focus is on the visual appeal of introducing streetcars rather than on delivering functional transit solutions. Many cities have mistakenly assumed that merely installing streetcar lines would create successful urban spaces reminiscent of European cities, disregarding the need for integrating robust transit systems and supportive urban policies. This resulted in many projects being perceived as superficial, lacking the infrastructural and operational integrity necessary to encourage genuine transit use. Such misguided prioritization can hinder the development of effective and lasting urban transit solutions.
Looking Ahead: Sustainability and Improvement
For the future, the potential success of streetcar systems depends on their integration into wider transit networks and urban planning strategies that prioritize effective commuting. If cities embrace a synergistic approach to transit, whereby streetcars are part of a larger, coherent public transport system, they may see positive outcomes. Moreover, ongoing developments and expansions could generate the necessary ridership and community support that these streetcars need to thrive. However, without careful planning and genuine commitment to effective urban transit policies, these systems risk being relegated to underused infrastructure that doesn't serve their intended purpose.
In 2001, Portland built the first of their new streetcar system, which was a success, especially in attracting new development to the transit corridor. This kicked off a bunch of new transit projects in other US cities, eager to bring their own new development projects, and taking advantage of transit funding from the Obama administration. But somewhere along the way they forgot that there's more to transit than just a way to attract new development projects.
Directly support the production of this podcast, and listen to every episode early (and without ads!) by subscribing to Nebula: https://nebula.tv/agenda